A study to compare two different types of video laryngoscopes (Airtraq optical laryngoscope and McGrath video laryngoscope) for intubation in childre
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/07/034829
- Lead Sponsor
- Maulana Azad Medical College
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Children 2-8 yrs of age belonging to ASA I & II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia
2.Modified Mallampati class I and II
Exclusion Criteria
1.Inter-incisor gap <= 2.5cms
2.Hyper-reactive airway
3.Predicted difficult airway (orofacial deformities, oral cavity pathology, facial trauma, cervical spine pathology, suspected spine injury)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intubation Difficulty ScoreTimepoint: At the time of insertion, 2,4, 6, 8, 10 minutes after insertion of airway device
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Time to intubate <br/ ><br>2.Hemodynamic Response <br/ ><br>3.Incidence of ComplicationsTimepoint: - time interval between blade entry past the lips and appearance of first square capnograph <br/ ><br>-Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure at 2 min interval for first 10 mins after intubation <br/ ><br>