Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00937703
NCT00937703CompletedNot Applicable

Multicentric Evaluation of Two Telematics Systems (PDA Phone and IVS)in Type 2 Diabetics Patients in Failure of Oral Treatment and Having to Start a Treatment by Basal Insulin, Compared to a Conventional Care. National, Multicentric, Comparative Randomized Study

Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche pour l'Intensification du Traitement du Diabète28 sites in 1 country180 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
180
Locations
28
Primary Endpoint
Comparison HbA1c means of the 2 groups profiting from a telemonitoring system compared to the reference group.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

TELEDIAB-2 is a national, multicenter, controlled, randomised trial. The primary objective of the study is to show that during the initiation of a basal insulin treatment , a computerized decision-making system of adaptation of the insulin, coupled to a distance follow-up (thanks to PDAphone or an interactive vocal server (IVS)), is able to improve metabolic control at the end of 4 mouths as compared with conventional care.

Main judgment criteria: comparison of HbA1c means of the 2 groups profiting from a telemonitoring system compared to the reference group at 4 months.

Detailed Description

Secondary objectives :

  1. - To compare the 2 methods of telemonitoring employed.
  2. - To evaluate the speed of the glycemic attack of the objective to the rising, according to the method of follow-up employed.
  3. - To evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and the doctors with respect to systems of telemonitoring, and improvement of the quality of life (DQOL).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Type 2 diabetes since more than 3 years and claiming a strict balance glycemic;
  • •Patients treated since at least 3 months, by metformin and secreting insulinic (KNOWN or glinide);
  • •Patients uncontrolled with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and < 10% at the inclusion.
  • •BMI < 40 ;
  • •Patients requiring a insulin treatment
  • •Patients agree to start a slow insulin treatment
  • •Patients already practising the glycemic self-monitoring or agree to learn it and practise it;
  • •Patients able to include/understand operation and to use the PDA-phone and/or the SVI;
  • •Patient not taking part in another biomedical research study
  • •Patients agree to carry out at least 2 finger sticks per day;
  • •More than 18 years, there is no higher age limit.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients introducing any evolutionary pathology associated and not stabilized, exhibitor with an uncontrolled diabetes during the year to come;
  • •Patients in a situation which justifies of a clinical follow-up diabetologic more frequent than that (quarterly) envisaged by the study
  • •Patients requiring a transitory passage to insulin;
  • •Patients needing a hospitalization for the adaptation of insulin doses;
  • •Patients presenting a cardiologic event
  • •Patients presenting a hemoglobinopathy interfering with the proportioning of HbA1c;
  • •Patients suffering from drug-addiction, alcoholism or psychological troubles
  • •Type 1 or secondary diabetes
  • •Patients who don't need strict metabolic objectives;
  • •Pregnant or parturient patients
  • •person with no freedom.

Arms & Interventions

Group1: Control group

Placebo Comparator

face to face visit à T4mounths

Intervention: placebo (Device)

Group2: IVS Group

Active Comparator

face to face visit at T4mounths plus telephone visits each 2 weeks

Intervention: IVS (Device)

Group3: PDAphone group

Active Comparator

PDA system face to face visit at T4mounths plus telephone visits each 2 weeks

Intervention: PDAphone (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison HbA1c means of the 2 groups profiting from a telemonitoring system compared to the reference group.

Time Frame: To T4 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of evolution of HbA1c(T0 and T4 months)
  • Comparison of the average jeun glycemia the 14 days previous the visit in 4 months(T4 months)
  • Comparison of absolute HbA1c difference(T0-T4 months)
  • Comparison of percentage of patients within the objective glycemic (the last 3 days Jeun Glycemia average with between 0.73 and 1.08 g/l) at the end of the study, and the average time allowing to achieve this goal(T0 and T4 months)
  • Comparison of percentage of patients reaching HbA1c < 7.0% in 4 months(T0 and T4 months)
  • Comparison of the evolution of the weight(T0 and T4 months)
  • Comparison of evolution of the quality of life at the beginning and at the end of the study (the scale of quality of life DHP as well as the items of dimension Satisfaction of the DQOL)(T0 and T4 months)
  • Effective number of patients carrying on the use of the system in routine care, at their own expense and in agreement with their physician(4 months)
  • Comparison of the frequency of benign hypoglycemias, symptomatic or not, night and severe throughout study(study period)
  • Comparison of the time spent by physicians with patients during visit (either face to face visits or phone call visit);(study period)
  • Comparison of the satisfaction of the patients and physicians with the system and willingness to carry on the use of the system in routine care(4 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche pour l'Intensification du Traitement du Diabète
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (28)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials