MedPath

Written vs Electronic Safety Planning Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Mental Health
Suicidal Ideation
Suicide Attempt
Interventions
Other: Safety Net App
Registration Number
NCT04026308
Lead Sponsor
University of Arkansas
Brief Summary

Safety planning is a brief, ED-feasible intervention which has been demonstrated to save lives and has been universally recommended by every recent expert consensus panel on suicide prevention strategies. In one popular version of the safety plan developed by Stanley et al, the patient is encouraged to write out the following items: identifying personal signs of a crisis; helpful internal coping strategies; social contacts or settings which may distract from a crisis; using family members or friends for help when in crisis; mental health professionals who can be contacted when in crisis; and restricting access to lethal means.

This study aims to find out how valuable an electronic safety plan is compared to a traditional paper safety plan. People who are visiting the emergency department for thoughts of self-harm will be asked to participate.

Detailed Description

This project has 3 aims: (1) Will ED patients with suicidal ideation/attempt accept coaching on safety planning from non-clinical personnel (i.e., medical students or peer supporters); (2) Are these safety plans of high-enough quality for clinical personnel; and finally, (3) Will ED patients with suicidal ideation/attempt complete safety plans electronically?

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients presenting for suicidal ideation (SI) or after a suicide attempt to the UAMS ED
  • Willingness to engage in safety planning with trained non-clinical staff
  • Have not already filled out a safety plan at the current visit
Exclusion Criteria
  • <18 or >89 years of age
  • Incarcerated or in police custody
  • Non-English-speaking or Non-English-writing (as translators will not be available for this study)
  • Critically-ill (or appear to be critically-ill)
  • Intoxicated with alcohol or other substance(s)
  • ED staff objection to patient enrollment in study
  • Unwilling or unable to complete the safety plan electronically
  • Unwilling or unable to use a tablet device to complete the safety plan
  • Unwilling or unable to show/email the safety plan to clinical and research staff

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Electronic Safety PlanSafety Net AppParticipants will complete a suicide safety plan in the Safety Net app using a tablet.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Length of StayUp to 12 hours

The length of stay in the ED for patients approached who agree to allow trained non-clinical staff to assist with safety planning.

Acceptability of InterventionUp to 12 hours

The number of patients approached who agree to allow trained non-clinical staff to assist with safety planning.

Satisfaction With Safety PlanningUp to 12 hours

Evaluate patient satisfaction with safety planning. This will be assessed by having the patient rate their experience with the safety planning process on a 7-point Likert scale (1 - strongly disagree; 2 - disagree; 3 - moderately disagree; 4 - neutral; 5 - moderately agree; 6 - agree; 7 - strongly agree). A Likert scale measures how much someone disagrees or agrees with a particular statement.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

🇺🇸

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath