跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05333640
NCT05333640Unknown不适用

A Real-world Registry Investigating Sirolimus-coated Balloon Versus Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Fistula

Singapore General Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2022年4月18日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Circuit Primary Patency Rate at 6 months

研究概览

简要总结

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been shown to be superior to POBA in the treatment of stenosis in AVF. This is because the very intervention used to treat underlying stenosis by POBA can induce vascular injury and accelerate intimal hyperplasia, resulting in rapid restenosis and need for repeated procedure to maintain vessel patency. The anti-proliferative drug that is coated on the surface of balloon is released to the vessel wall during balloon angioplasty and blunt the acceleration of intimal hyperplasia response, resulting in improved primary patency after angioplasty. Additionally, unlike stents, DCB does not leave a permanent structure that may impede future surgical revision. Recent randomized control trials (RCT) have shown the superiority of paclitaxel durg-coated balloon (PDCB) over POBA in the treatment of stenosis in AVFs. In a large multicenter RCT, PDCB was demonstrated to result in a 6-month target lesion primary patency of 82.2% compared to 59.5% for POBA. However, concerns had also arisen recently in the use of PDCB. In large lower limb studies involving the use of paclitaxel devices, meta-analysis by Katsanos et al had revealed increased late risk mortality in patient that are treated with PDCB or paclitaxel-coated stent.

Sirolimus drug-coated balloon (SDCB) is the new generation of drug eluting balloons that are available in the market. Compared to paclitaxel, sirolimus is cytostatic in its mode of action with a high margin of safety. It has a high transfer rate to the vessel wall and effectively inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in the porcine coronary model. The effectiveness of SDCB in patients with dialysis access dysfunction has been shown in a small pilot study in AVF stenosis and AVG thrombosis. SAVE AVF registry ams to assess the efficacy and safety of SDCB vs PDCB angioplasty.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 21-85 years
  • Patient who required balloon angioplasty for dysfunctional or thrombosed AVF
  • Successful thrombolysis and angioplasty of the underlying stenosis, defined as less than 30% residual stenosis on Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) based on visual assessment of the operator and restoration of thrill in the AVF on clinical examination. For concurrent asymptomatic or angiographically not significant central vein stenosis, patients can be included in no treatment is required.
  • received either PDCB or SDCB for the treatment of stenosis.

排除标准

  • Patient unable to provide informed consent
  • Presence of symptomatic or angiographically significant central vein stenosis who require treatment, with more than 30% residual stenosis post angioplasty
  • Patients who had underwent stent placement within the AVF circuit
  • Sepsis or active infection
  • Recent intracranial bleed or gastrointestinal bleed within the past 12 months.
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast media, heparin, paclitaxel or sirolimus
  • Pregnancy
  • Inadequate treatment of underlying stenosis, defined as >= 30% residual stenosis of the underlying lesions.

结局指标

主要结局

Circuit Primary Patency Rate at 6 months

时间窗: 6 months post-op

Circuit primary patency is lost if patient has to undergo a repeat intervention that is clinically driven. Clinically driven indication may be based on physical examination such as loss of thrill, pulsatile flow or swollen arm.

次要结局

  • Circuit Primary Patency at 12 months(12 months post-op)
  • Target Lesion Restenosis(6 and 12 months post-op)
  • Number of repeat interventions to treated lesion(6 and 12 months post-op)
  • Target lesion revascularization free interval(12 months post-op)
  • Complication rates of the procedure(Time of procedure)
  • Number of repeat interventions to maintain access circuit(6 and 12 months post-op)
  • Mortality rates of patients(6 and 12 months post-op)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验