Efficacy of beauti sealnt compared to embrace wet bond sealant.
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/09/027912
- Lead Sponsor
- BChaitanyaBharathi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1.Subjects between age group of 11-13 years
2. A Deep occlusal surface, fissure or incisal
lingual pit is present.3.The area selected is confined to a full erupted
fossa, even though the distal fossa is impossible to
seal due time inadequate eruption
4.The fossa selected for sealant placement is well
isolated from another fossa with a restoration
5.subjects who will ready to follow the instructions
during study period.
6.subjects who willing to participate in the study
with written informed consent.
1.Subject behavior does not permit use of adequate
dry field techniques through the procedure.
2.An open carious lesion3.Caries exist on other surface of the same tooth in
which restoring will disrupt an intact sealant
4.A large restoration is already present.
6.History of any adverse reaction to any of the
restorative material used
7.History of abnormal parafunctional activity
8.Heavy occlusal contacts on the teeth to be
restored
9.History of any medical disease that might
interfere with the study
10. Highly uncooperative child
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Retention,Anatomic contour,Marginal integrity,Surface texture,Secondary cariesTimepoint: 1 month <br/ ><br>3 month <br/ ><br>6 month
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Retention,Anatomic contour,Marginal integrity,Surface texture,Secondary cariesTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months