Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04978961
NCT04978961CompletedNot Applicable

A Novel Treatment Delivery of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain in an Integrated Primary Care Setting

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio1 site in 1 country26 target enrollmentStarted: October 9, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
26
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Self-reported physical disability

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial sought to: 1) evaluate implementation of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy treatment for chronic pain delivered by an integrated behavioral health consultant in primary care; and to 2) explore treatment outcomes and their associated mechanisms of change.

Detailed Description

Background: Most patients with chronic pain obtain their treatment in primary care settings, where evidence-based behavioral interventions are not typically provided, despite robust evidence for treatments like Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.

Objective

This mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial sought to: 1) evaluate implementation of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy treatment for chronic pain delivered by an integrated behavioral health consultant in primary care; and to 2) explore treatment outcomes and their associated mechanisms of change.

Design: Mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial. Active participants completed one 30-minute individual Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (FACT) visit followed by 3 weekly 60-minute group visits and a booster visit 2 months later. An enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) control group received 4 handouts about pain management based on cognitive behavioral science. Follow-up research visits occurred during and after treatment, at 12 weeks (booster visit), and at 6 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the last research visit.

Setting: A small integrated primary care clinic in southwestern U.S. affiliated with an academic medical center

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Masking Description

PI was masked to assessment outcomes during intervention phase

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age 18 and older
  • •at least one non-cancer pain condition persisting for 12 weeks or more
  • •a current primary care clinician at the study clinic
  • •ongoing treatment for a non-cancer chronic pain condition

Exclusion Criteria

  • •social anxiety or unwillingness to participate in a class setting
  • •presence of symptoms of psychosis and/or delirium
  • •a medical condition or life circumstance that would contraindicate or prevent participating (e.g. upcoming surgery)
  • •inability to comprehend the informed consent process or study instructions.

Arms & Interventions

Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (FACT)

Experimental

Focused Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (FACT): FACT is a brief type of cognitive behavioral therapy that helps patients reduce disability through increased acceptance, reconnection with values, and reduced unhelpful control/coping strategies. Patients randomized to the intervention group received FACT per the study manual, delivered by an integrated Behavioral Health Consultant (BHC). Patients had one individual visit (30 minutes) and three consecutive weekly group visits (one hour) followed by a booster visit two months later. These classes (group visits) were rolling, not cohort-driven, meaning new and returning patients will be attending together. After the individual BHC visit and each class, patients had behavioral "homework" to complete.

Intervention: Focused Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (FACT) (Behavioral)

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU)

Active Comparator

Patients randomized to the Enhanced-Treatment As Usual (ETAU) group received "enhancement" of usual primary care via 1-page (2-sided) educational handouts on four topic areas: Sleep, Pacing, Relaxation and Goal Setting. All topics have an evidence base in standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy treatment of pain. One handout per assessment visit was given to each patient. Patients will continue to see their primary care clinicians and have access to all routine clinical services throughout the study.

Intervention: Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU) (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Self-reported physical disability

Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item self-report scale that assesses perceived disability and functional impairment across a range of daily activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived disability. Although originally developed as a measure of back pain, we used an established modified version that asked about "pain" rather than "back pain." The ODI uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, which is summed to create a total score (maximum 50) that is then divided by highest possible score based on items skipped, and doubled to provide a percentage of patient perceived disability. The ODI and has been validated across a wide range of populations as a reliable and useful indicator of overall disability. Scores range from 0 - 100.

Acceptability of the FACT intervention

Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

Acceptability of the FACT intervention from the participants' perspective was measured via 3 Likert-scale questions gathered during the semi-structured interview focused on: perceived benefit, ease of learning about pain management, and whether the participant would recommend the FACT treatment to a friend or family member

Feasibility of intervention and study (attrition and satisfaction ratings)

Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

Feasibility was evaluated using a priori established benchmarks: (a) \< 25% participant attrition; (b) at least 80% of participants rating the FACT program as satisfactory as measured by response of at least 5 on a 7-point Likert-scale (1= Not Satisfied at All, 7 = Very Satisfied). The satisfaction question was asked in the context of an "exit interview": all participants who completed the 6-month follow-up assessment were contacted by the PI to provide feedback on their experiences in the study.

Self-reported physical disability

Time Frame: Booster (12 weeks from baseline)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item self-report scale that assesses perceived disability and functional impairment across a range of daily activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived disability. Although originally developed as a measure of back pain, we used an established modified version that asked about "pain" rather than "back pain." The ODI uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, which is summed to create a total score (maximum 50) that is then divided by highest possible score based on items skipped, and doubled to provide a percentage of patient perceived disability. The ODI and has been validated across a wide range of populations as a reliable and useful indicator of overall disability. Scores range from 0-100.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Chronic Pain Acceptance(6-month follow-up)
  • Engagement in Valued Activities(6-month follow-up)
  • Chronic Pain Acceptance(Booster (12 weeks from baseline))
  • Engagement in Valued Activities(Booster (12 weeks from baseline))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials