Evaluation of Ultra-portable Ultrasound in General Practice
- Conditions
- Intra-uterine Pregnancy or Extra-uterine Pregnancy or MiscarriagePleural EffusionRenal ColicHepatic Colic or CholecystitisSubcutaneous Abscess or CystFracture of Long BonesPhlebitisPneumonia
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound scan
- Registration Number
- NCT04127149
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
This is an interventional multi-centre study comparing two groups of general practitioners with or without an ultrasound scanner over a period of 6 months. The evaluation focuses on the management of patients for 8 pathologies:
* Pneumonia
* Pleural effusion
* Renal colic
* Hepatic colic or cholecystitis
* Subcutaneous abscess or cyst
* Fracture of long bones
* Intra-uterine pregnancy or extra-uterine pregnancy or miscarriage
* Phlebitis The principal hypothesis is that there are fewer complementary exams in the group of doctors using ultrasound scanners.
The secondary hypotheses are:
* There is better patient orientation (emergency care, specialist consultation, return home) in the group of doctors using the ultrasound scanners.
* The global cost of the care is lower in the group of doctors using the ultrasound.
* Using ultrasound during the consultation decreases the anxiety of the patient.
* Using ultrasound increases the duration of the consultation.
* There is no difference between the predicted and the real orientation of the patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 166
- patients age 18 and over
- consulting their general practitioner for one of the 8 conditions below
- patients who have already received an imagery exam for the acute episode justifying the consult
- opposition to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group with ultrasound Ultrasound scan The first group consists of nine general practitioners having received a brief training on the use of ultrasound scanners in general practice. The general practitioner includes all adult patients who are consulting for one of the 8 medical conditions studied and perform an ultrasound scan. Two weeks later, he/she calls each patient to collect the necessary data.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of complementary exams Two weeks after inclusion Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know:
* The number of imagery exams they had (ultrasound, MRI, scanner, radiology...)
* The number of biological analysis (CRP, ASAT, ALAT, Lipase...)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of hospitalisations, specialist orientation or return home Two weeks after inclusion Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know if within the past two weeks, they have been hospitalised, required emergency care, needed to consult a specialist, or returned back home
Cost of care Four weeks after inclusion in the study After knowing the patient orientation and the complementary exams they had, an estimation of the cost of care is made.
Anxiety score measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) scale Two weeks after inclusion in the study Two weeks after the initial consultation, with or without ultrasound scanners, the general practitioners call their patients to know the result of the anxiety test they took the day of the first consultation.
Consultation duration Two weeks after inclusion in the study The day of the first consultation, the general practitioner writes the time spent
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Maison de santé pluridisciplinaire Léopold Ollier
🇫🇷Les Vans, France