Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
- Conditions
- Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
- Interventions
- Procedure: Conventional physiotherapyProcedure: Bobath treatment approach
- Registration Number
- NCT04768140
- Lead Sponsor
- Istanbul Arel University
- Brief Summary
In this study, it is investigated that whether Bobath approach is superior to conventional physiotherapy in terms of improving hemiplegic shoulder pain, spasticity and upper extremity functionality in stroke patients.
- Detailed Description
Objective: This study aims to determine the effect of Bobath approach on hemiplegic shoulder pain, spasticity and upper extremity functionality in stroke patients.
Patients and Methods: For this prospective, randomized, controlled and single-blind trial, 30 stroke patients aged 40-65 years with hemiplegic shoulder pain were included. Patients were divided into two groups and randomized into these groups. Only conventional physiotherapy was applied to the control group, whereas both conventional physiotherapy and Bobath exercises were also applied to the experimental group. Visual analog scale (horizontal) for shoulder pain, modified Ashworth scale for spasticity and Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity for functionality were used for both pre-test and post-test.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Patients between the ages of 40 and 65
- Patients who had a stroke for the first time and had a disease duration of at least four weeks
- Patients who were diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Patients who had Brunnstrom stage 3, 4 or 5 and had hemiplegic shoulder pain were included in the study.
- Patients with severe cognitive impairment who could not understand simple verbal commands
- Those who had severe dysarthria to prevent verbal communication
- Those with unilateral neglect syndrome
- Those with loss of sensation in the upper extremity of the hemiplegic side
- Those with botulinum toxin-A injected to the hemiplegic upper extremity muscles
- Those with previous shoulder-related trauma or pain history
- Those with other accompanying neurological disease were excluded from the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional physiotherapy group Conventional physiotherapy Only conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group. Bobath group Conventional physiotherapy A conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group. Additionally, Bobath treatment approach was applied for 10 repetitions during a 30-min session in the experimental group, in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program. Bobath group Bobath treatment approach A conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group. Additionally, Bobath treatment approach was applied for 10 repetitions during a 30-min session in the experimental group, in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment score at 30 sessions, 6 weeks First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks Upper extremity functionality, min-max: 0-66, "0" indicates no function of upper extremity, "66" indicates the highest functionality of upper extremity as possible.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale (horizontal) value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks Hemiplegic shoulder pain, 0-10 cm scale, "0" shows no pain at hemiplegic shoulder, "10" shows unbearable pain intensity at hemiplegic shoulder
Change from baseline modified Ashworth scale value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks Upper extremity spasticity, 0: No increase in tone, 1: slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension.
1+: slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM )
2: more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed
3: considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult
4: limb rigid in flexion or extension
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Istanbul, Bahçelievler, Turkey
University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital🇹🇷Istanbul, Bahçelievler, Turkey