Suprachoroidal Spheroidal Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Clinical Results of 6 Months Follow-up
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 15
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in electrophysiological testing after stem cell implantation in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Purpose: This prospective clinical case series aimed to evaluate the effect of suprachoroidal implantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the form of spheroids as a stem cell therapy for retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients with relatively good visual acuity.
Methods: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with RP who received suprachoroidal implantation of MSCs in the form of spheroids were included. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), 10-2 and 30-2 visual field examination and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) recordings were recorded at baseline, postoperative first, third- and sixth-months during follow-up.
Detailed Description
A prospective clinical trial was conducted in patients with RP at the department of ophthalmology, Acibadem University, Medical school. The study was approved by the Review Board of Cell, Organ and Tissue Transplantation Department of Turkish Ministry of Health. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patient Evaluation Fifteen patients with clinical and genetic diagnoses of RP were included in the study. Patients underwent ophthalmic examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, anterior segment examination and dilated fundus examination (with topical tropicamide %1 and phenylephrine 2.5%). Each eye underwent spectral domain OCT scanning with Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT Angioplex (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), fundus autofluorescence and fundus fluorescein angiography (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). MD (mean deviation) and PSD (pattern standard deviation) parameters of 10-2 and 30-2 visual field (VF) testing strategies with a Humphrey Field Analyzer model 750I (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) were obtained. The electrophysiological function was assessed with mfERG evaluation (Monpack 3, Metrovision, France) according to the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) guidelines [27]. BCVA was converted to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) equivalent.
The patients were excluded from the study, if they had 1) coexisting ocular pathology that may affect visual acuity, visual field and retinal morphology such as glaucoma, uveitis, previous vitreoretinal surgery, 2) coexisting cataract that may affect mfERG, visual field and/or ocular imaging, 3) refractive error that may affect measurements higher than +6.00D, lower than -6.00D 4) coexisting systemic diseases that may affect visual function such as diabetes, vasculitis, rheumatological diseases and chronic immunosuppressive use, 5) periocular injection of platelet-rich blood and transcorneal electrical stimulation in previous 6 months and 6) previous ocular surgery.
Electrophysiologic Testing After 30 minutes of dark adaptation and pupil dilatation with the application of one drop of tropicamide 1% (Tropamid, Bilim ˙Ilaç, Turkey), phenylephrine 2.5% (Mydfrin, Alcon), and proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (Alcaine, Alcon), ERG jet electrodes were placed. Multifocal electroretinographies were recorded after pupil dilatation. The stimulated retinal area was subtended in an area of 60° x 55°; 61 hexagon stimulants were used with alternating black (5 cd/m2) and white (100 cd/m2) stimulants. The concentric rings were analyzed according to International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards.13 The amplitude and latencies of P1, N1, and N2 components were recorded for every ring. The mean signal amplitudes (MSAs) of multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in the macula (central 0°-2°) and the peripheral (2°-5°,5°-10°, 10°-15°, and >15°) signal amplitude changes were evaluated separately.
Spheroidal Stem Cell Preparation First passage umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell was obtained from Labcell Cellular Laboratory Center which provides GMP (good manufacturing practices) conditions.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Clinical and genetic diagnosis of Retinitis Pigmentosa
Exclusion Criteria
- •Coexisting ocular pathology that may affect visual acuity, visual field and retinal morphology such as glaucoma, uveitis, previous vitreoretinal surgery,
- •Coexisting cataract that may affect mfERG, visual field and/or ocular imaging,
- •Refractive error that may affect measurements higher than +6.00D, lower than -6.00D
- •Coexisting systemic diseases that may affect visual function such as diabetes, vasculitis, rheumatological diseases and chronic immunosuppressive use,
- •Periocular injection of platelet-rich blood and transcorneal electrical stimulation in previous 6 months and 6) previous ocular surgery
Arms & Interventions
Retinitis Pigmentosa patients
Suprachoroidal mesenchymal stem cell implanted Retinitis pigmentosa patients
Intervention: Stem cell implantation (Biological)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in electrophysiological testing after stem cell implantation in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Time Frame: 3 years
The electrophysiological function was assessed with mfERG evaluation (Monpack 3, Metrovision, France) according to the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) guidelines.After 30 minutes of dark adaptation and pupil dilatation with the application of one drop of tropicamide 1% (Tropamid, Bilim ˙Ilaç, Turkey), phenylephrine 2.5% (Mydfrin, Alcon), and proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (Alcaine, Alcon), ERG jet electrodes were placed. Multifocal electroretinographies were recorded after pupil dilatation. The concentric rings were analyzed according to International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards. The amplitude and latencies of P1, N1, and N2 components were recorded for every ring. The mean signal amplitudes (MSAs) of multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in the macula (central 0°-2°) and the peripheral (2°-5°,5°-10°, 10°-15°, and \>15°) signal amplitude changes were evaluated separately.
Change in visual acuity after stem cell implantation in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Time Frame: 3 years
Pre-implantation and post-implantation BCVA was converted to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) equivalent.
Change in microperimetric evaluation after stem cell implantation in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Time Frame: 3 years
MD (mean deviation) and PSD (pattern standard deviation) parameters of 10-2 and 30-2 visual field (VF) testing strategies with a Humphrey Field Analyzer model 750I (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) were obtained.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Berna Özkan
Professor
Acibadem University
