MedPath

Effect of Intraoperative Volume Optimization on Outcome After Intrabdominal Surgery

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Surgery
Hemodynamic Instability
Interventions
Other: standard volume administration
Other: volume optimization
Registration Number
NCT00766519
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intraoperative goal-directed fluid management (with goal = cardiac stroke volume maximization) based on respiratory-induced pulse pressure variation monitoring may improve outcome after intrabdominal surgery

Detailed Description

Recent studies strongly suggest that intraoperative oesophageal doppler guided fluid management may improve outcome after intrabdominal surgery. In these studies, however, the number of patients was often small, and management in control groups as well as postoperative complications were usually not precisely defined. In addition, widespread use of oesophageal doppler cannot be advocated in routine surgery, and the strategy necessitates repeated volume loading. This may lead to unnecessary intravenous fluids which may be deleterious, and intraoperative fluid restriction has also been shown to improve clinical outcome. In this context, indices reflecting the hemodynamic changes during mechanical ventilation (the so-called "dynamic indices", and more specifically the respiratory-induced pulse pressure variation) have been shown to accurately predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Automated and continuous calculation of pulse pressure variation variation from standard peripheral (typically radial) arterial line has recently been validated. This study was thus designed to determine whether intraoperative goal-directed fluid management (with goal = cardiac stroke volume maximization) based on pulse pressure variation monitoring would improve outcome after intrabdominal surgery.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
104
Inclusion Criteria
  • major elective intrabdominal surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • arrhythmia
  • hepatectomy
  • associated thoracic surgery
  • laparoscopy
  • pregnancy
  • allergy to colloid solution or anesthesia protocol
  • arterial catheter not possible

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
control; standard volume administrationstandard volume administrationstandard volume administration
Optimizationvolume optimizationvolume optimization: continuous monitoring of the respiratory-induced arterial pulse pressure variation during surgery and systematic minimization to 10% or less by volume loading
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total number of patients with complicationsfirst 7 postoperative days
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to initial passage of flatus and fecespostoperative
total number of complicationsfirst 7 postoperative days
Duration of hospital staypostoperative
SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scorepostoperative days 1 and 5
duration of stay in intensive care unitpostoperative
deathin-hospital and postoperative day 28
volumes of fluid administeredduration of surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

University Hospital

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Estaing, CHU

🇫🇷

Clermont-ferrand, France

University hospital Henri-Mondor

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath