MedPath

Radiation Therapy Planning Techniques in Reducing Damage to Normal Tissue in Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Registration Number
NCT00602628
Lead Sponsor
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as multifunctional magnetic resonance imaging and CT scans, may help reduce normal tissue damage in patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well radiation therapy planning techniques work in reducing damage to normal tissue in women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for ductal breast carcinoma.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

* To improve precision of tumor bed localization and definition of clinical target volume, and to reduce normal tissue irradiation in women undergoing partial breast or breast boost radiotherapy.

* To test whether post-operative MRI improves the precision of tumor bed delineation after wide-local excision in comparison with the current standard CT scan/clip method.

* To determine the impact of tumor position within the excision specimen upon the localization of clinical target volume in relation to the tumor bed.

* To compare theoretical non-target tissue exposure from partial breast irradiation planned in the supine and prone (face-down) positions.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo planned breast-conservation surgery and placement of titanium clips to the four radial, the deep, and superficial margins of the excision cavity (for localization of tumor bed).

Within 2 weeks after surgery, patients undergo supine radiotherapy-planning CT scan as standard analysis. Patients then undergo a radiotherapy-planning CT scan in the prone position. Patients complete a linear analogue questionnaire after both scans designed to assess patient comfort and anxiety in each position. Patients then undergo multifunctional MRI (including dynamic contrast-enhancement MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI) of the ipsilateral breast in the prone position (≥ 3 weeks after surgery). If suspicious lesions ≥ 5 mm are found on MRI, patients are referred for a second-look ultrasound with biopsy (if lesion visible on ultrasound); where suspicious lesions are seen only on MRI, patients undergo MRI-guided biopsy. Lesions \< 5 mm are included in the whole-breast radiotherapy treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in lung NTDmean (biologically weighted [normalized] mean of total dose to lung normalized to 2 Gy fractions) in supine vs prone positions
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in mean volume of PTV in supine versus prone positions
Difference in dose homogeneity within PTV in each position
Closeness of agreement between clinical target volumes (CTVs) defined using uniform margin vs those defined using knowledge of all excision margins
Difference in complexity of beams needed to achieve above dose homogeneity within PTV
Closeness of agreement between MRI-based vs CT scan/clip- based delineation of tumor bed
Difference in NTDmean to ipsilateral non-planning target volume (PTV) breast tissue, chest wall muscle, and heart
Patient comfort with each positioning technique (assessed by questionnaire)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Royal Marsden - Surrey

🇬🇧

Sutton, England, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath