Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Lorazepam and Diazepam for Children in the Emergency Department With Seizures (Status 2)
- Registration Number
- NCT00621478
- Lead Sponsor
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Brief Summary
Children with seizures are frequently seen in the emergency department. The drug lorazepam, which is commonly used, is not labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for children for this use. The FDA, under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, has requested that a study comparing diazepam, a drug that is labeled by the FDA for this indication, with lorazepam be performed. The study will show whether one drug is more effective and safe than the other.
- Detailed Description
Textbooks and expert opinion recommend both diazepam and lorazepam as initial therapy for children in status epilepticus (SE) and provide recommended doses that are commonly used. However, unlike diazepam, lorazepam is only FDA-approved for treatment for SE in patients over 18 years of age. Despite this fact, many experts support the use of lorazepam over diazepam in pediatric SE. Increased duration of action, increased effectiveness in terminating SE, and a lower incidence of respiratory depression have been cited as potential advantages of lorazepam over diazepam. However, data to support firm recommendations for one medication over another are lacking. Thus, either diazepam (FDA-approved) or lorazepam can be considered first-line agents for pediatric SE, and the physician's choice of agent depends on local practice patterns and individual treatment styles. In the prehospital (Emergency Medical Services) setting, diazepam is commonly chosen because of a longer shelf life without refrigeration.
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in efficacy and safety between these two commonly used benzodiazepines, as requested by the FDA under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, using the Exception from Informed Consent provided by the FDA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 259
-
Age 3 months to less than 18 years;
-
Generalized tonic clonic status epilepticus, defined as:
- Three or more generalized tonic clonic seizures within the last hour and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the third convulsion within one hour); or
- Two or more generalized tonic clonic seizures in succession with no recovery of consciousness between seizures and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the second convulsion without recovery of consciousness after the first convulsion); or
- A seizure that lasts at least 5 minutes that is either generalized tonic clonic in its entirety or starts focal and then generalizes. The seizure must be associated with loss of consciousness
- Pregnancy;
- Shock prior to study drug (sustained hypotension requiring inotropic therapy);
- Significant dysrhythmia prior to study drug (other than sinus tachycardia);
- Need for emergent surgical intervention and general anesthesia for a condition present prior to study drug;
- Known sensitivity to benzodiazepines or known contraindication to benzodiazepine use; or
- Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
Certain exclusion criteria may not be known at the time of drug administration due to the need for emergent treatment. Thus patients will be terminated from the study (early terminators) if the investigators discover any of the following conditions after administration of study drug:
- Pregnancy;
- Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
- Parent/guardian refusal to give informed consent by the methods described;
- Patient's refusal to assent (for patients ≥ 7 yrs old and mentally competent to understand study procedures) by the methods described, or as required by the local IRB;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cohort 1 lorazepam or diazepam Cohort 1 (preconsented) patients will involve obtaining informed consent from the legally authorized representative of a potential study subject before they present to the ED in SE. Patient assent will be obtained for patients as per local IRB rules. The consent document (enclosed in this application) will inform parents that if their child comes to the ED and qualifies for the study based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be enrolled. Patients who cannot be contacted to confirm consent will be enrolled in Cohort 2 (EFIC) as detailed below. Patients in Cohort 1 will be randomized in a blinded fashion to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg Cohort 2 lorazepam or diazepam Cohort 2 (EFIC) will include patients who appear in the ED with SE and qualify for the study but have not given prior consent. These patients will be enrolled under the EFIC regulations. The parent/guardian will be given the opportunity to object to participation or ask additional questions. The child will be enrolled (dosed) with study medication under an EFIC. Once the child is stabilized, a research staff member will approach the parent or LAR to obtain informed consent to continue the child's participation in the study. If a parent or LAR refuses continued participation, then no further study procedures will be performed. Safety and data will be collected in accordance with federal regulations. Cohort 2 will be randomized, like Cohort 1, to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method cessation of convulsions within 10 minutes of the initial administration of the study drug and a sustained absence of convulsions for 30 minutes from the initial administration of the study drug. 30 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling. 24 hr feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial 2 years the experience of community consultation and public disclosure 2 years feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent 2 years determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach 2 years severe or life-threatening respiratory depression 4 hours
Trial Locations
- Locations (14)
Children's Hospital Colorado
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Children's Hospital of Michigan
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Michigan Emergency Medicine Research
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Children's National Medical Center
🇺🇸Washington DC, District of Columbia, United States
University of Utah Pediatric Emergency Medicine
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin Children's Corporate Center
🇺🇸Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Alberta Children's Hospital
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Children's Medical Center Dallas
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Children's Hospital of Buffalo
🇺🇸Buffalo, New York, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
University of California- Davis Medical Center
🇺🇸Davis, California, United States
University of Maryland Hospital for Children
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada