A study to compare the effectiveness of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and Mulligan mobilization with movements (MWM) on pain, range of motion, and functional disability in subjects with frozen shoulder
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 95
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- NPRS
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares the effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Mulligan Mobilization with Movements (MWM) in managing Frozen Shoulder (FS), a condition causing pain, stiffness, and limited mobility. Conducted at RV College of Physiotherapy, and clinics around south banglore the study involves 190 participants divided into two groups receiving either IASTM or MWM therapy for four weeks. Pain, range of motion, and functional disability will be assessed using NPRS, SPADI, and goniometric measurements.The findings will help determine the more effective technique, providing evidence-based recommendations for FS treatment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Subjects of age group 40-65years 2) Subjects with fresh diagnosis of Frozen shoulder 3) subjects with NPRS score more than six.
排除标准
- •Subjects with malignancy or neuromuscular disorders 2) Subjects with recent surgeries 3) Subjects with other shoulder pathologies and injuries 4) Fracture/other trauma of upper limb 5) Conditions contraindicated to manual therapy.
结局指标
主要结局
NPRS
时间窗: Baseline, 4 weeks
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
时间窗: Baseline, 4 weeks
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr S Fuzal Ahmed
RV COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY