Gleevec and Gemzar in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Phase 2

Completed

Conditions: Ovarian Cancer
Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Interventions: Drug: imatinib mesylate by mouth
Drug: Gemcitabine Intravenous

Registration Number: NCT00928642

Lead Sponsor: Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine

Brief Summary: This study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of Gleevec and Gemzar in patients with ovarian cancer, who have progressed after receiving at least one prior chemotherapy treatment. Gleevec is an oral chemotherapy drug used is this study and Gemzar is an IV chemotherapy drug used. Participation in the treatment portion of the study will continue as long as the patient's tumors shrink or remain stable and as long as the patient is able to tolerate the study drug. The follow-up portion of the study will last for 5 years.

Detailed Description: Each 21 day period will be considered a cycle. Disease status will be assessed with a Cancer Antigen (CA)-125 prior to the start of each new cycle with an assessment of measurable diseased by either CT or MRI every 6 weeks. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or the patient elects to withdraw from the study. All patients will be followed until disease progression or study withdraw. In addition, following disease progression, patients will be monitored for delayed toxicity and survival for a period of 5 years, unless consent is withdrawn.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: Female

Target Recruitment: 8

Inclusion Criteria

Patients 18 years of age or greater
Histologically documented diagnosis of ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. Histological subtypes include: mucinous tumor, serous tumor, endometrioid tumor, and other histologies including clear cell and undifferentiated epithelial tumors.
At least one measurable site of disease (as defined by Southwestern Oncology Group Solid Tumor Response Criteria) or other response assessment criteria, as appropriate.
Patients must have relapsed after receiving at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy.
Performance status of 0, 1, 2, (ECOG)
Adequate end organ function: Total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN, SGOT and SGPT < 2.5 UNL, creatinine < 1.5 x UNL, ANC > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L.
Patients will most likely have had their ovaries removed at the time off initial surgery. If any subjects are of childbearing potential at the time of entry, they must have negative pregnancy test within 7 days before initiation of study drug dosing. Postmenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential. Subjects of reproductive potential must agree to employ and effective barrier method of birth control throughout the study and for up to 3 months following discontinuation of the study drug.
Written, voluntary informed consent.
Patients must be eligible for care at a military medical treatment facility.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient has received prior treatment with Gemzar.
Patient has received any other investigational agents within 28 days of the first day of study drug dosing.
Patient is < 5 years free of another primary malignancy except: if the other primary malignancy is neither currently clinically significant nor requiring active intervention, or if other primary malignancy is a basal cell skin cancer or a cervical carcinoma in situ. Existence of any other malignant disease is not allowed.
Patient with Grade III/IV cardiac problems as defined but the New York Heart Association Criteria.
Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Patient has a severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (i,e. uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled chronic renal disease, or active uncontrolled infection).
Patient has a known untreated or progressive brain metastasis.
Patient has known chronic liver diseases (i.e. chronic active hepatitis, and cirrhosis.
Patient has a known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV infection ).
Patient received chemotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosourea or mitomycin-C) prior to study entry, unless the disease is rapidly progressing..
Patient previously received radiotherapy to greater than or equal to 25% of the bone marrow.
Patient had a major surgery within 2 weeks prior to study entry.
Patient with any significant history of non-compliance to medical regimens or with inability to grant reliable informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Oral Imatinib plus intravenous gemcitabine	imatinib mesylate by mouth	All research subjects receive oral imatinib 400mg days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21 day cycle. All research subjects received IV gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 days 3 and 10 of a 21-day cycle. . All subjects had epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinomatosis and had failed to respond to prior chemotherapy or progressed after prior chemotherapy.
Oral Imatinib plus intravenous gemcitabine	Gemcitabine Intravenous	All research subjects receive oral imatinib 400mg days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21 day cycle. All research subjects received IV gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 days 3 and 10 of a 21-day cycle. . All subjects had epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinomatosis and had failed to respond to prior chemotherapy or progressed after prior chemotherapy.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The Cystostatic, Anti-tumor Activity of the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar Via Progression-free Survival for at Least Six Months in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma.	Time to progression was measured from enrollment in study until documented disease progression over a period not greater than 2 years.	Progression free survival at six months was assessed for all research subjects. Progression defined by SWOG criteria: Invest New Drugs. 1992 Nov;10(4):239-53. Progression is defined as \> 50% increase in the sume of measured cross sectional area of areasa of measurable disease, measured from the lowest measured amount of disease. Progression is also defined as new areas of measurabe disease.
To Determine the Safety and Tolerability Via Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effect of Combination Gleevec and Gemzar in This Cohort of Patients as Assessed Byt Common Toxicity Criteria	Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity	Toxicity was assess prior to each cycle of therapy (every 3 weeks) and graded based on NCI common toxicity criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Tumor Response Rates Using Modified SWOG Criteria to the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar in Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed at Least One Prior Chemotherapy Treatment.	Subjects treated until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. no maximum dose was specified	Best response to thearpy was assessed using modified SWOG criteria (same as for outcome masure #1). Subjects were assess as "complete response", "partial response", "stable disease", and "progressive disease" after 2 cycles (6 weeks) of beginning treatment and every 6 weeks afterward until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or subject withdrawl from study. the measurement reported is the number of patients who met the criteria for partial response.
To Determine the Distribution of the Overall Survival	Until death	All subjects were followed after treatment was complete to assess overall survival.
To Estimate the Clinical Response Rate(Partial and Complete Response as Defined Under the SWOG Criterial)	until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity	Using SWOG criteria for response of measurable disease, subject best response was assessed. First assessment was 6 weeks after starting treatment. Subjequent evaluations were every 6 weeks in patients who remained on study. Repsonse rate was the sum of Complete Repsonse and Partial Response.
To Assess the Effects of Prognostic Variables; Initial Performance Status; Platinum Sensitivity, and Mucinous (or Clear Cell)Histology on Progression-free Survival Overall.	Until disease progression	The study was stopped after 8 subjects. It was not possible to perform meaningful analysis on prognostic variables. this outcome measure was not done.