The efficacy of meaning-centered psychotherapy in women at risk for developing eating disorders
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Eating Disorder Symptoms
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON26003
- Lead Sponsor
- o sponsors
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 128
Inclusion Criteria
Female, total score of 47 or higher or answering 'often' or 'always' on the question 'How often do you feel fat' on the Weight Concern Scale (Jacobi et al., 2011; indicative of being at risk for developing an eating disorder), fluent speaker of either Dutch, English, or German
Exclusion Criteria
Male, currently in treatment for an eating disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Meaning in life (MEMS, MLQ)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Satisfaction with normative life domains (BMS-LSS-C), pyschological well-being (Ryff's PWB Scales), general distress (DASS), eating disorder symptoms (EDE-Q), BMI, intolerance of uncertainty (IUS-SF)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What neurobiological mechanisms underlie meaning-centered psychotherapy's impact on eating disorder symptoms in high-risk women?
How does meaning-centered psychotherapy compare to CBT in reducing disordered eating behaviors among women with subclinical symptoms?
Are there specific psychological biomarkers that predict response to meaning-centered interventions in eating disorder prevention?
What adverse events are associated with meaning-centered psychotherapy versus wait-list control in eating disorder risk populations?
What combination therapies show synergistic effects with meaning-centered approaches for preventing eating disorder progression?