Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02723253
NCT02723253
Completed
Phase 2

Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna0 sites18 target enrollmentJanuary 2005
InterventionsRadiotherapyTom-OX
DrugsTom-OX

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Radiotherapy
Conditions
Rectal Neoplasms
Sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Enrollment
18
Primary Endpoint
Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival.However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence after conventional treatment. Therefore investigators designed a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival. However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence (LR) after conventional treatment. This was a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy. The primary aim was to assess the pathological complete response rate. Key secondary aim was the resectability. Secondary aims were evaluation of treatment-related acute and late toxicity, local control, disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). The follow-up period of each subjects started after the radiochemotherapy treatment and ended after a maximum of 36 months of observation or until death.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2005
End Date
February 2012
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lorenzo Fuccio

Associate Professor of Gastroenterology

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically proven locally advanced (T4N0-2) or locally recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Eastern Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Metastatic patients
  • unfit surgery patients,
  • pregnant or breast feeding females
  • patients with clinically detectable ascites

Arms & Interventions

Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox

Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.

Intervention: Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox

Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.

Intervention: Tom-OX

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.

Time Frame: 8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy

Pathologic responses of the primary tumours were defined according to the Mandard regression grading system: grade 1 was recorded when no tumour cells remained in the primary tumour and lymph nodes (pCR); grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis; grade 3 was characterized by an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated; grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis; and grade 5 was characterized by an absence of regressive changes. Good responders were defined those patients with a pathologic response with Mandard G1 or G2 and poor responder patients with Mandard G3, G4 or G5.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0(Up to 36 months. In details, follow-up examinations were performed 4 weeks after surgery and every 6 months until the established length of follow-up or death.)
  • The number of patients without disease (i.e. rectal cancer) during the follow-up.(Up to 36 months.)
  • The number of patients still alive at the end of follow-up(Up to 36 months)
  • Number of patients in which a surgical resection was feasible(8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy)

Similar Trials