Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications of Cardiac Surgery

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Diseases; Coronary Disease; Coronary Artery Occlusion

• Registration Number: NCT03094923
• Lead Sponsor: University of the State of Santa Catarina

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the profilatic effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on functional capacity, respiratory muscle strength, postoperative pulmonary complications and days of hospitalization (PPC) in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery are at risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, which lead to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.

A few studies have demonstrated that preoperative physical therapy has advantages over postoperative care in patients undergoing cardiac . In this way, this study aim to investigate the effects of preoperativeinspiratory muscle training in patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications who were scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2010-01-12
• Primary Completion: 2011-03-17
• Study Completion: 2014-01-18
• Status Verified: 2017-03
• Study First Submitted: 2017-03-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-03-23
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-03-23
• Study First Posted: 2017-03-29
• Last Update Posted: 2017-03-29

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 32

Inclusion Criteria

• High-risk patients underwent primary elective CABG (Coronary artery bypass graft), High-risk will be defined as 2 or more the following: age>70 years; cough and expectoration; diabetes; smoker; COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)

Exclusion Criteria

• Uncontrolled arrhythmia,
• Decompensated heart failure,
• Unstable angina upon selection or during the inspiratory muscle training (IMT),
• Need for reoperation and association of another procedure during surgery (e.g. valve correction associated with CABG)
• Severe orthopedic or neurological conditions.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications	1 month	The postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) will be classified according to an ordinal scale from 1 to 4 , as proposed by Kroenke (2002).; The PPCs will be defined as clinically significant if the individual presented two or more Level 2 items or one or more Level 3 and/or 4 items. The Level 1 items were considered subclinical.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Lenght of hospital stay hospitalization	1 month	The postoperative length of stay in hospital will be assessed by calculating the number of days the patient in the hospital from the day of the surgery until the hospital discharge authorized by the cardiology team physician.
Functional Capacity	1 month	The functional capacity will be assessed by means of a 6-minute walk test (T6min) in accordance with the "American Thoracic Society - ATS" guidelines. Two tests will carried out, with a thirty minute interval between them, at a flat location inside the hospital. The 30 meter distance to be covered in a straight line will be marked with a measuring tape. The patient's performance will be assessed according to the longest distance covered (Holland et al, 2014)
Respiratory Muscle Strenght	1 month	The respiratory muscle strength will be determined by means of a calibrated analogical manovacuometer, graded from -120 to +120cmH20, defining the maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP). The MEP will be measured by the patient's maximum inflation of the lungs (total lung capacity), followed by a maximum forced expiration lasting 1 second. The maximum inspirator pressure (MIP) assessment will be carried out by the patient's maximum expiration, followed by a maximum inspiratory force lasting 1 second. At least three technically acceptable measurements will be carried out, presenting a difference of 10% or less among the values. The analysis considered the highest value (Neder, 1999; Hulzebous, 2006)