MedPath

Clinical Investigation of the Nucleus® CI532 Cochlear Implant

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hearing Loss
Interventions
Device: Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant
Registration Number
NCT02392403
Lead Sponsor
Cochlear
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical benefit for patients implanted with the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant and to demonstrate the atraumatic nature of the electrode design.

Nucleus® CI532 has a pre-curved, perimodiolar array, the EA32, which is introduced into the cochlea through a straightening sheath.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • Eighteen years of age or older at the time of implantation
  • Conventional candidate for cochlear implantation with a perimodiolar electrode array according to local criteria (excepting the exclusion criteria that follow)
  • Native speaker in the local language used to assess clinical performance
Exclusion Criteria
  • Evidence of hearing loss prior to 5 years of age
  • Prior cochlear implantation; i.e. having a cochlear implant in the contralateral ear, or previously implanted in either ear
  • Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate undergoing general anaesthesia or surgery
  • Ossification, malformation or any other cochlear anomaly, such as common cavity, that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array, as confirmed by medical examination
  • Hearing impairment due to lesion or neuropathy of the acoustic nerve, VIII nerve or central auditory pathway
  • Active middle-ear infection
  • Tympanic membrane perforation
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices
  • Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements such as undergoing a post-operative digital volume tomography/ConeBeam scan
  • Patients with existing Cerebral Spinal Fluid shunts or drains, existing perilymph fistula, skull fracture or Cerebral Spinal Fluid leak
  • Patients with recurrent episodes of bacterial meningitis
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Known allergies to components of the implant
  • Wearing other active implants with known interference with cochlear implants

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Nucleus CI532 cochlear implantNucleus CI532 cochlear implant-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Scalar Position of Electrode Array Determined With Computer Tomography (CT) Scanup to one month post-surgery

The position of the electrode array can be completely in scala tympani, completely in scala vestibuli, or may transverse from scala tympani to scala vestibuli. The position can be determined from high resolution flat panel volume tomography (Cone beam) imaging.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Array Proximity to the Modiolus Measured Using the Wrapping Factorup to one month post-surgery

The ratio of the active array length and the corresponding lateral wall length

Surgeon Questionnaire on Implant Surgeryat time of surgery

To collect experiences using the CI532. At each surgery, the surgeon was asked whether "overall the CI532 was easy to handle and the EA32 easy to insert". We counted the number of surgeons who strongly agreed or who agreed.

Change From Baseline in Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise at 6 Monthsbaseline and 6 months post activation

Change in percent correct speech recognition test scores for implant ear alone and best aided

Patient Reported Benefit in Health Status Assessed Via Glasgow Benefit Inventory Questionnaire6 months post activation

The Glasgow Benefit Inventory is a single time point measure of patient reported benefit.

A score of 0 indicates no benefit; the minimum score is -100 and the maximum is +100.

Change From Baseline in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire at 6 Monthsbaseline and 6 months post activation

Rating scale. 0=worst; 10=best

Number of Adverse Events at Surgeryat time of surgery
Change From Baseline in Air-conduction Pure-tone Hearing Thresholds Via an Audiogram at 6 Monthsbaseline and 6 months post activation

We report only the change for the 500 Hz frequency.

Number of Adverse Events Post Surgery to 6 Months Post-activationpost surgery to 6 months post-activation

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel

🇩🇪

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University of Freiburg

🇩🇪

Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

🇩🇪

Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

Service d' ORL et d'Otoneurochirurgie, CHU Toulouse Purpan

🇫🇷

Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France

The HEARing CRC

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Medizinische Hochschule

🇩🇪

Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany

Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

🇩🇪

Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil

🇪🇸

Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath