NCT00643409
Completed
Phase 3
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparative Trial of Azithromycin SR Versus Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Maxillary Sinusitis in Adults Undergoing Diagnostic Sinus Aspiration
ConditionsMaxillary Sinusitis
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- placebo
- Conditions
- Maxillary Sinusitis
- Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Enrollment
- 541
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- sponsor assessment of clinical response for the Clinical per Protocol population
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 14 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The objectives of the study were to confirm that a single, 2.0-g dose of azithromycin sustained release (SR) was at least as effective to 10 days of oral levofloxacin 500 mg once a day, when used to treat adults with uncomplicated, acute bacterial sinus infections, and to evaluate the safety of both treatments.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients were included if they had a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis as demonstrated by presence of the cardinal signs and symptoms for a minimum duration of 7 days, a sinus X-ray (Water's view) confirming the clinical diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis, and 2 or more of following: fever, leukocytosis, frequent coughing, headache, nasal congestion, or post-nasal drainage.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients were excluded if they were treated with any systemic antibiotic within 7 days prior to enrollment, had symptoms lasting for longer than 28 days, had 4 or more episodes of acute sinusitis within the preceding 12 months, had nasal or sinus surgery within 3 months prior (except for a diagnostic procedure), or complicated or nosocomial sinusitis.
Arms & Interventions
1
Intervention: placebo
2
Intervention: levofloxacin
2
Intervention: placebo
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
sponsor assessment of clinical response for the Clinical per Protocol population
Time Frame: Test of Cure (TOC) visit (Day 17-24)
Secondary Outcomes
- sponsor assessment of clinical response by baseline pathogen for the Bacteriological per Protocol population(EOT visit and TOC visit)
- investigator assessment of clinical response for the Clinical per Protocol population(TOC visit)
- bacteriological response on a per pathogen basis for the Bacteriological Per Protocol population(TOC visit)
- summary of baseline susceptibilities(Study endpoint)
- adverse events(Continuous)
- laboratory abnormalities(during and post-treatment)
- sponsor assessment of clinical response for the Clinical per Protocol population(End of Treatment (EOT) visit (Day 11-13))
- sponsor assessment of clinical response for the remaining study populations(EOT visit and TOC visit)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Azithromycin SR Compared With Clarithromycin Extended Release for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Adult PatientsPneumoniaNCT00643227Pfizer504
Completed
Phase 3
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Azithromycin SR Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Pneumonia in Adult PatientsPneumoniaNCT00643734Pfizer468
Completed
Phase 3
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Azithromycin SR Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Symptoms of Chronic BronchitisBronchitis, ChronicNCT00644449Pfizer551
Terminated
Phase 2
Azithromycin Plus Chloroquine Versus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Plus Chloroquine For The Treatment Of Uncomplicated, Symptomatic Falciparum Malaria In Southeast AsiaMalaria, FalciparumNCT00084240Pfizer32
Completed
Phase 3
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Of Azithromycin SR Versus Amoxicillin For The Treatment Of Strep Throat In ChildrenTonsillitisNCT00643149Pfizer693