JPRN-UMIN000053250
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective study - Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective study
Conditionspelvic organ prolapse
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- pelvic organ prolapse
- Sponsor
- Hokusuikai-Kinen hospital
- Enrollment
- 184
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who have not agreed to the consent form for surgery. Switching from laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to another surgical intervention.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
se of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal implant fixation during sacrocolpopexy as part of the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse ICS-POPQ stage II-IIIN99.3N94.1Prolapse of vaginal vault after hysterectomyDyspareuniaDRKS00003263niversitäts-Frauenklinik208
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of sutures for the repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causesKCT0006596Koera University Guro Hospital40
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative evaluation antimicrobial sutures versus plain sutures in periodontal flap surgery.CTRI/2017/09/009940Dr Prerna Karde
Recruiting
Not Applicable
onabsorbable versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior ColporrhaphyDiseases of the genitourinary systemKCT0006334Seoul National University Hospital192
Recruiting
Not Applicable
se of absorbable suture in encircling band to treat pseudophakic retinal detachmentIRCT20200131046318N1Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences50