Comparison of Mask Ventilation Techniques in Patients Requiring General Anesthesia
- Conditions
- Apnea
- Interventions
- Procedure: V-E mask ventilation for one minuteProcedure: C-E mask ventilation for one minute
- Registration Number
- NCT02580526
- Lead Sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of two kinds of two-handed facemask ventilation techniques (when breathing is supported with machines) at the time that general anesthesia is started. Study participants will start with one technique and then cross over to the other technique.
- Detailed Description
This study will compare the effectiveness of two-handed V-E mask ventilation technique with the C-E technique. The study hypothesis is based on following considerations:
1. Using C-E technique, the operator's fingers pressure mouth closed and push posteriorily the soft tissue of submandibular region.
2. V-E approach maintains mouth open, creates larger oral cavity and allow positive pressure generated during inspiration to push forwards submandibular region.
Anesthesia care team members, residents or CRNAs familiar with bag-valve mask ventilation, will perform mask ventilation. After receiving preoperative medications, subjects will be placed on the operating table, and electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, and cutaneous oxyhemoglobin saturation monitoring will be applied. The depth of sedation will be assessed and kept by the care team with IV bolus of propofol.
The sizes of masks will be chosen by the care team and only one size will be used for both techniques. The subject's head will be placed in the neutral position on a pillow and elevate 10 cm from the operating room table, but no backward head tilt or jaw thrust will be performed. One hundred percent oxygen will be delivered throughout the study. The subject will be encouraged to hyperventilate by taking deep breaths to facilitate preoxygenation before the induction of anesthesia.
Pre-oxygenation will be carried out with maximal fresh gas flow and FiO2 1.0 until the expired O2 at or greater than 80%. Then anesthesia will be induced by an intravenous bolus injection of propofol (1-2 mg/kg) after an intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl (50-150 ug).
When the apnea occurs, the subjects will be ventilated with one of the two techniques randomly, either two-handed "C-E" facemask ventilation technique (Group A) or with "V-E" technique (Group B). Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ration of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the expiratory tidal volume is greater than 15ml/kg of ideal body weight, then peak inspiratory pressure will be reduced to 15 cmH2O and 15cm H2O peak inspiratory pressure will be used through the entire the study. The study will be in two steps. Subject will start with one technique (Step 1) and then cross over (Step 2). The subjects in Group A will be first ventilated with "C-E" grip. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and carbon dioxide measured during exhalation in the first three breaths, ventilation will continue and complete total 10 breaths (Step 1). Then the subject will be ventilated with two-handed "V-E" grip (Step 2). In Step 1, if the subject cannot be adequately ventilated with C-E grip for even one of the first three breaths, then the subject crosses over and receives V-E grip. If the subject can be adequately ventilated with V-E for at least one of the first 3 breaths, ventilation will continue and complete total 10 breaths. The study will be completed. If the subject cannot be ventilated adequately for at least one of the first three breathes with C-E for the first breaths, nor after crossover with V-E grip, then the study will be terminated and routine care is applied including oral or nasal airway placement, intubation with LMA or tube or waking up the patient.
If subjects are randomized to start with "V-E" technique (Group B), the protocol will be identical to that in Group A except the sequence of applying the two ventilation techniques is reversed.
Upon completion of the study, narcotic and paralytic agent will be given in the usual way and the trachea will be intubated. The oxyhemoglobin saturation will be monitored throughout the study by pulse oximetry and will be maintained \> 90%. The study will last about 5 minutes.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 104
- >18 years of age
- Requiring general anesthesia in the main operating rooms at Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- BMI greater than 30
- Untreated ischemic heart diseases
- Respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma,
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class of 4 or greater,
- Undergoing emergency surgery,
- Requiring rapid sequence intubation for aspiration protection,
- Induction of anesthesia is not done with IV propofol,
- Requiring fiberoscopic intubation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description V-E mask ventilation technique crossover C-E mask ventilation V-E mask ventilation for one minute - C-E mask ventilation technique crossover V-E mask ventilation V-E mask ventilation for one minute - C-E mask ventilation technique crossover V-E mask ventilation C-E mask ventilation for one minute - V-E mask ventilation technique crossover C-E mask ventilation C-E mask ventilation for one minute -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in expired tidal volume for one minute of each technique one minute of expired tidal volume for each mask ventilation technique
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Vanderbilt University
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States