Single vs Multiple-Fraction Therapy in Treating Patients With Previously Irradiated Painful Bone Metastases
- Conditions
- Metastatic CancerPain
- Interventions
- Radiation: radiation therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT00080912
- Lead Sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether single-fraction (single-dose) re-irradiation therapy is as effective as multiple-fraction (many small doses of radiation therapy) re-irradiation therapy in relieving bone pain caused by bone metastases.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying single-dose radiation therapy to see if it works as well as multiple-dose radiation therapy in treating patients previously irradiated with painful bone metastases.
- Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
* Compare pain relief in patients undergoing single-fraction vs multiple-fraction re-irradiation of painful bone metastases at 2 months after treatment.
Secondary
* Compare overall pain relief in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare time to pain progression in patients treated with these regimens.
* Assess relationship between response to initial radiation and pain relief after re-irradiation in these patients.
* Compare changes in functional interference after re-irradiation using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens (patients in Canada, France, the Netherlands, and patients registered through RTOG).
* Determine characteristics of non-responders (to both initial and re-irradiation) among patients treated with these regimens.
* Monitor the incidence of acute severe radiation-related side effects in patients treated with these regimens.
* Monitor the incidence of in-field pathological fractures and spinal cord compression in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to response to initial radiotherapy (yes vs no), initial fractionation (single fraction vs multiple fraction), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive single-fraction radiotherapy (8Gy) on day 1.
* Arm II: Patients receive multiple-fraction radiotherapy (to a total of 20Gy) over 5 days or over 8 days if re-irradiation of the spine and/or whole pelvis is involved AND prior initial radiotherapy was given in multiple fractions.
At least 4 weeks after the first re-treatment, patients in both arms may receive a second re-treatment at the discretion of the treating oncologist.
Patients complete a Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire at baseline, on days 7 and 14, monthly during months 1-6, and at months 9 and 12. Acute Toxicities are assessed on days 7 and 14. Quality of Life is assessed at baseline and then monthly during months 1-6 for patients from participating groups.
Patients are followed for up to 1 year.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 850 patients will be accrued for this study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 850
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm I radiation therapy Patients receive single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) on day 1. Arm II radiation therapy Patients receive multiple-fraction radiotherapy (to a total of 20 Gy) over 5 days or over 8 days if re-irradiation of the spine and/or whole pelvis is involved AND prior initial radiotherapy was given in multiple fractions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Relief Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory at 2 Months After Treatment 2 months The primary endpoint of this study is Overall Response Rate (complete response and partial response) at two months after the first fraction of re-irradiation. A complete response was defined as a Brief Pain Inventory worst-pain score of zero with no associated increase in daily oral morphine equivalent. A partial response was defined as pain that persisted after treatment, either with a worst-pain score reduction of 2 or more and no increase in daily oral morphine equivalent consumption, or no increase in pain and a reduction in daily oral morphine equivalent consumption of at least 25%.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (12)
CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The Vitalite Health Network - Dr. Leon Richard
🇨🇦Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
🇨🇦Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
🇨🇦Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston
🇨🇦Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre
🇨🇦Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Odette Cancer Centre
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre
🇨🇦Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
McGill University - Dept. Oncology
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
🇨🇦Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada