Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06116838
NCT06116838Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Effect of Varying Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters and Location on Lower Extremity Motor Responses and Comfort

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab2 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: October 20, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Continuous stimulation tolerance

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to understand how transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) waveform, modulation frequency, and stimulation location impact lower extremity muscle activation and participant comfort in adults without neurologic conditions.

Detailed Description

Investigators will use a test-retest design comparing neurophysiologic measures while receiving various combinations of stimulation waveforms, modulation frequencies, and stimulation locations to determine the settings which lead to the highest participant tolerance with the lowest lower extremity resting motor thresholds (RMTs).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Sequential
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years old
  • Able and willing to give written consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of stroke or neurologic pathologies (such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, etc.)
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Skin allergies or irritation; open wounds
  • Utilizing a powered, implanted cardiac device for monitoring or supporting heart function (i.e. pacemaker, defibrillator, or LVAD)
  • History of seizures or epilepsy
  • Active cancer or cancer in remission less than 5 years
  • Metal implants in the back or spine
  • Painful musculoskeletal dysfunction due to injury or infection
  • Unstable cardiorespiratory or metabolic diseases (e.g. cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, or chronic emphysema)

Arms & Interventions

Carrier frequency + Waveform

Experimental

Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (sEMP) will be obtained while stimulating the spinal cord at a single site with single pulses. sEMP are the electromyograph responses of the peripheral muscles to electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. We will test various waveform combinations of biphasic and monophasic waveforms with modulation frequencies of 0-10 kHz. Participants will also ambulate while receiving continuous stimulation of the various waveform combinations to determine what stimulation intensity is comfortable for each combination. The order we complete this testing will be randomized. All participants will perform testing in a different order.

Intervention: Spinal motor evoked responses (sMERs) (Device)

Carrier frequency + Waveform

Experimental

Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (sEMP) will be obtained while stimulating the spinal cord at a single site with single pulses. sEMP are the electromyograph responses of the peripheral muscles to electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. We will test various waveform combinations of biphasic and monophasic waveforms with modulation frequencies of 0-10 kHz. Participants will also ambulate while receiving continuous stimulation of the various waveform combinations to determine what stimulation intensity is comfortable for each combination. The order we complete this testing will be randomized. All participants will perform testing in a different order.

Intervention: Continuous stimulation tolerance (Device)

Stimulation Location

Experimental

Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (sEMP) will be obtained while stimulating the spinal cord at various stimulation locations with single pulses. sEMP are the electromyograph responses of the peripheral muscles to electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. Participants will also ambulate while receiving continuous stimulation to various stimulation locations to determine what stimulation intensity is comfortable for each location. The order we complete this testing will be randomized. All participants will perform testing in a different order.

Intervention: Spinal motor evoked responses (sMERs) (Device)

Stimulation Location

Experimental

Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (sEMP) will be obtained while stimulating the spinal cord at various stimulation locations with single pulses. sEMP are the electromyograph responses of the peripheral muscles to electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. Participants will also ambulate while receiving continuous stimulation to various stimulation locations to determine what stimulation intensity is comfortable for each location. The order we complete this testing will be randomized. All participants will perform testing in a different order.

Intervention: Continuous stimulation tolerance (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Continuous stimulation tolerance

Time Frame: All study visits (1-10), over the course of up to 5 weeks

Participants may receive up to 45 min of locomotion training (treadmill or overground training) with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. Participants will report what level of stimulation intensity they consider comfortable or tolerable (rating of less than 8 out of 10 on the Rating of Perceived Discomfort scale)

Resting motor threshold

Time Frame: All study visits (1-10), over the course of up to 5 weeks

The RMT is the minimum intensity of stimulation required to evoke a motor response in the lower-limb muscles while the subject is at rest.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD

Executive Director, Technology & Innovation Hub (tiHUB); Director, Max Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies & Outcomes Research

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials