Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07169383
NCT07169383Enrolling By InvitationPhase 2

Efficacy of Oral Melatonin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma

Hina Malik1 site in 1 country160 target enrollmentStarted: June 28, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Sponsor
Enrollment
160
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Total participants are 160, 80 in Group A and 80 in Group B

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will compare the efficacy of oral melatonin and oral tranexamic acid in treating melasma, with the aim of determining whether melatonin is more effective than tranexamic acid, as measured by MASI scores. Literature suggests melatonin may be more effective due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-melanogenic properties. The findings will assess whether melatonin provides better efficacy and tolerance compared to tranexamic acid in managing this persistent condition. Efficacy will be assessed by comparing the baseline MASI scores with the scores obtained at six-week and twelve-week follow-up points based on the following cut-offs:

<25% improvement Mild response 25-50% improvement Moderate Response 51-75% improvement Good response >75% improvement Excellent Response

Detailed Description

This study will compare the efficacy of oral melatonin and oral tranexamic acid in treating melasma.Literature suggests melatonin may be more effective due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-melanogenic properties.Efficacy will be assessed by comparing the baseline MASI scores with the scores obtained at six-week and twelve-week follow-up points based on the following cut-offs:

<25% improvement Mild response 25-50% improvement Moderate Response 51-75% improvement Good response >75% improvement Excellent Response It's a Randomized Control Trial conducted at PAEC General Hospital. Study period is of 6 months.Total sample size is 180 patents.The sample is divided into two groups, with 80 patients assigned to each treatment.This study hypothesizes that oral melatonin will be more effective than oral tranexamic acid in reducing the severity of melasma, as measured by changes in the Melasma Area and Severity Index.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Adult patients aged 18-50 years diagnosed with melasma.
  • •Both genders.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with contraindications to melatonin, including pregnancy, breastfeeding, autoimmune disorders, bleeding disorders, and diabetes, or contraindications to tranexamic acid, including thromboembolic events, history of thrombosis, renal impairment, and pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • •Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the medications.
  • •Patients already taking treatment of melasma

Arms & Interventions

Group B - Oral tranexamic acid

Active Comparator

Group B will receive oral tranexamic acid 250mg twice daily for 3 months after ruling out any contraindications.Melasma area and severity index will than be calculated on day one , 6 weeks and 12 weeks.

Intervention: Tranexamic Acid (TXA) (Drug)

Group A - Oral melatonin

Active Comparator

Group A will receive oral melatonin 5mg daily at night for 3 months after ruling out any contraindications. Melasma Area and severity index will be calculated at day one , 6 weeks and 12 weeks.

Intervention: Melatonin tablet (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total participants are 160, 80 in Group A and 80 in Group B

Time Frame: 12 weeks

Group A will receive oral melatonin 5mg HS for 12 weeks and Group B will receive oral tranexamic acid 250 mg BD for 12 weeks and then the improvement will be assessed by calculating MASI score at day 1, 6weeks and 12 weeks.MASI score less than 10 is considered mild , 11-20 is considered moderate and more than 20 is considered Severe Melasma. An improvement greater than 25% in the MASI score will be considered as the threshold for treatment efficacy.

Efficacy of Oral Melatonin VS Oral Tranexamic Acid in the management of Melasma

Time Frame: 12 weeks

As per literature Melatonin may be more effective due to its Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory and anti-melanogenic properties. The findings will assess whether Melatonin provides better efficacy and tolerance compared to Tranexamic Acid in managing Melasma.An improvement greater than 25% in the MASI score will be considered as the threshold for treatment efficacy.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Hina Malik
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hina Malik

Post Graduate Trainee

PAEC General Hospital, Islamabad

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials