MedPath

The A.R.R.E.S.T.® Contact Lens Study

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Myopia
Myopia Progression
Registration Number
NCT06878118
Lead Sponsor
nthalmic Pty Ltd
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if contact lenses using Active Reconfiguration in Retinal Encoding of Spatio-Temporal (A.R.R.E.S.T.®) signal technology works to slow down the rate of myopia progression compared to single vision contact lenses in myopic children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do contact lenses using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology slow down the rate of axial length growth? Do contact lenses using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology slow down the rate of increase in myopic refractive error?

Researchers will compare contact lenses using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology to a single vision contact lens.

Participants will:

Be randomly allocated to wear either contact lenses using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology or single vision contact lenses.

Visit the clinic on seven occasions over a 12 month period.

Detailed Description

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the rate of myopia progression as measured by change from dispensing, in axial length and the change from Baseline in the spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction between a contact lens using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology (test) and a single vision contact lens (control). Myopic children (7-15 years of age) will be randomly allocated to wear either test or control.

The overall trial duration, including follow-up period, is expected to be approximately 18 months. Each participant's duration is expected to be approximately 12 months.

The visits are Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.

All procedures performed at these visits are standard, non invasive clinical tests.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Axial LengthBaseline, then1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after baseline

Difference in change from baseline in axial length between each test and control.

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefractionBaseline, then 6 months, and 12 months after baseline

Difference in change from Baseline in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction between each test and control.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 mBaseline, then 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after baseline

Difference in visual acuity between each test and control.

Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after baseline

Difference in subjective visual performance between test and control after a minimum wear of one month.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Wenzhou Medical University

🇨🇳

Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Optometry Clinic, Faculty of Health Science, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

🇲🇾

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath