Hyper- and Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis Study
- Conditions
- Hypokalemic Periodic ParalysisHyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis
- Interventions
- Drug: Placebo (double-blind)
- Registration Number
- NCT00494507
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare Dichlorphenamide with placebo (an inactive substance) for prevention of episodes and for improvement of strength in hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis. This study will also look at the long-term effects of Dichlorphenamide in periodic paralysis.
- Detailed Description
Periodic paralysis is a relatively rare, life-long disorder characterized by intermittent bouts of paralysis, progressive weakness, and diminished quality of life. Two drugs, acetazolamide (ACZ) and dichlorphenamide, have been prescribed to treat the disorder, however, dichlorphenamide is no longer available.
In this multi-center, parallel, randomized trial researchers will compare the effects of dichlorphenamide vs. placebo in patients with hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis.
The trial consists of two 9-week studies-one study will enroll persons with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and the other study will enroll persons with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: dichlorphenamide or placebo (an inactive substance). During the studies, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record the time, length, and severity of each episode of weakness (attack). The study coordinator will contact participants weekly to review the diary information.
The 9-week phase will be followed by a 1-year open-label dichlorphenamide extension without placebo to determine the long-term effects of dichlorphenamide on the course of the disease and on inter-attack weakness.
Duration of the trial for participants is approximately 65 weeks, including a screening phase to determine eligibility, the first 9-week treatment phase, and the one-year open-label extension phase.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 71
- Genetically definite, clinically definite or clinically probable Hyperkalemic or Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis as outlined in the protocol
- Male and female participants, age 18 and older who are able to comply with the study conditions.
- Participants who have distinct regular episodes of weakness with an average frequency of > or = to 1 a week and < or = to 3 a day either on or off treatment, whichever is higher
- Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level
-
Evidence for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (any one of the following 3 criteria)
-
Prolonged QT interval or complex ventricular ectopy between attacks
-
Distinctive physical features (2 of the following 5)
- Low set ears
- Short stature
- Hypo-/micrognathia
- Clinodactyly
- Hypo-/hypertelorism
-
KIR 2.1 gene mutation
-
-
Coincidental renal, hepatic, active thyroid disease, restrictive or obstructive lung disease, other neuromuscular disease, or heart disease
-
Chronic, non-congestive, angle-closure glaucoma
-
Use of any of the following medications for reasons other than treatment of periodic paralysis: diuretics, antiarrhythmics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics, magnesium
-
History of life-threatening episodes of respiratory muscle weakness or cardiac arrhythmias during attacks
-
Pregnancy
-
Known mutation in the alpha subunit of the sodium channel gene in hypokalemic periodic paralysis patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HYP Dichlorphenamide Dichlorphenamide (open-label) Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HYP Placebo Dichlorphenamide (open-label) Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HOP Dichlorphenamide Dichlorphenamide (open-label) Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HYP Dichlorphenamide Dichlorphenamide (double-blind) Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HOP Dichlorphenamide Dichlorphenamide (double-blind) Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HOP Placebo Placebo (double-blind) Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HYP Placebo Placebo (double-blind) Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase. HOP Placebo Dichlorphenamide (open-label) Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HYP Attack Rate 8 weeks The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.
HOP Attack Rate 8 weeks The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.
The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.
The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).HYP Attack Duration 8 weeks HYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass Baseline and 9 weeks Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass Baseline and 9 weeks Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
HOP Attack Duration 8 weeks HOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate 8 weeks HYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.
The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score Baseline and 9 weeks The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score Baseline and 9 weeks The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score Baseline and 9 weeks The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate 8 weeks HOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening 0-9 weeks Increase in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening 0-9 weeks Increase in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.
The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.
The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores Baseline and 9 weeks The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.
The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score Baseline and 9 weeks The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
Trial Locations
- Locations (12)
Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
University of Texas Southwestern-Dallas
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
Mayo Clinic
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States
UCLA Neurology
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California-San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Brigham & Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
University of Milan
🇮🇹San Donato, Milan, Italy
Institute of Neurology-Queen's Square
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States