跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06895850
NCT06895850已完成不适用

Eccentric Cycling Vs. Standard Rehabilitation for Post-ICU Recovery in COVID-19 Survivors

Universidad Nacional Andres Bello1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2021年10月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
One-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test

研究概览

简要总结

We performed a longitudinal crossover clinical study on survivors of COVID-19. We compared a standard rehabilitation protocol using elastic bands versus a novel eccentric cycling training protocol in individuals who have been discharged after being hospitalized due to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of these two rehabilitation modalities on physical performance, quality of life, and cognitive function parameters. We found that both protocols induced significant improvements in all variables. However, eccentric cycling induced such improvements involving less time per session. These findings could significantly impact strategies to treat COVID-19 survivors, which is a novel and impactful contribution to the body of knowledge.

详细描述

Twenty patients (9 men, 11 women) between the ages of 30 and 60 years who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 in an ICU volunteered for this study. Participants were hospital-discharged at least 6 months before the start of the study and had not undergone rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

This study utilized a two-treatment crossover design. Each treatment was eight weeks in duration, with a two-week washout period. The order of treatments was randomized and counterbalanced. Twenty participants were recruited and completed this study. This sample was deemed sufficient as an a-priori power analysis (G*Power 3.1.9, Germany) estimated that 18 patients were required to test the anticipated effect, considering a statistical power of 0.8 and alpha <0.05. This effect was estimated based on the 18.7% increase in the 6-minute walking test observed after 12 weeks of eccentric training [10]. Considering a 10% dropout, we recruited 20 participants for this study.

Condition order was randomly arranged as either ECC then STD REHAB (n=10) or STD REHAB then ECC (n=10) to account for a potential order effect of treatments. Both interventions lasted eight weeks, and assessments were performed before and after the interventions. As shown in Fig. 1A, during the ECC participant performed eccentric cycling using an arm-and-leg motorized cycle ergometer (Model ABJ-107-2, Medical Technology Co LTD, China) while during the STD REHAB condition participants performed functional rehabilitation using strengthening exercises with elastic bands (Fig. 1B). During the 2-week wash-out period, the participants refrained from training in preparation for their second intervention.

2.3 Interventions The exercise intensity was matched between conditions throughout the intervention period using the 6-20 point rating of perceived exertion (RPE; Borg´s Scale) [10]. For both groups, RPE progressively increased during the first two weeks from 9 (very light) to 11 (fairly light), and then over the next five weeks from 13 (somewhat hard) to 15 (hard). Additionally, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (Omron Serie 5/7156, USA), and oxygen saturation (Heal Force A3, CHOICEMMED, China) were measured immediately after all training sessions to quantify the cardiovascular demands of training, which were averaged between training sessions.

The training protocol for the ECC consisted of a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary ergometer (RS1 Go, Life fitness, USA) before completion of the prescribed workout. In the first two weeks, participants completed two sets of 10 minutes of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 9-11 with 2 minutes of inter-set rest. Then, during weeks 3-8, participants completed two sets of 15 min of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 13-15 with 2 min inter-set rest.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Participants were hospital-discharged at least 6 months before the start of the study and had not undergone rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

排除标准

  • •Patients who did not pass the medical check-up before the study (patients with myocarditis and/or abnormal troponins or electrocardiograms from the last three months), oxygen-dependent patients, those with musculoskeletal injuries, bedridden patients, disoriented patients, or those with severe mental disabilities were excluded due to being unsafe to exercise.

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention

Experimental

Participants performed the eccentric cycling training for 8 weeks (experimental group)

干预措施: Eccentric cycling training (Other)

Standard Rehabilitation

Active Comparator

The training protocol for STD REHAB consisted of the same 5 min warm-up protocol used in ECC, followed by three sets of 8 repetitions of bicep curls, triceps extensions, shoulder abduction, bodyweight squats, deadlifts, and leg abductions with an elastic band with 2 min inter-set rest. The resistance of the elastic band tension was progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance based on RPE. ECC training was programmed for ~20-30 min, while STD REHAB lasted ~60 min per session.

干预措施: Standar Rehabilitation (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

One-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test

时间窗: Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups)

The participants were asked to cross their arms with hands on the opposite shoulders and to sit and stand from the chair as many times as possible in one minute \[19\]. This test serves as an estimate of lower extremity power and functional capacity \[19\].

Muscle Strength (Medical Research Council; MRC)

时间窗: Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups)

Manual strength of six muscle groups (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion) was evaluated bilaterally following the MRC scale guidelines \[17\]. Each muscle group was rated on a scale from 0 (paralysis) to 5 (normal strength). The MRC-sum score evaluates global muscle strength. The final score ranges from 0 (total paralysis) to 60 (normal muscle strength in all four limbs) \[17\].

Handgrip Strength

时间窗: Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups)

Manual handgrip strength was evaluated with a hand dynamometer (Jamar, USA) with the participant, seated with the elbow at 90°, performing a maximum grip for 3 seconds, expressed in kilograms. Three attempts were made for the dominant upper limb, with a one-minute rest between attempts, and the highest of the three values was registered \[18\].

Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

时间窗: Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups)

The 6MWT measured the distance a person could walk in 6 minutes as quickly as possible \[10\]. It was conducted in a 30 m long corridor. If the participant experienced chest pain, dyspnoea, sweating, cyanosis, or chest discomfort during the test, the test was stopped, and the distance covered until the onset of symptoms was recorded.

Timed up and go (TUG)

时间窗: Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups)

Participants were instructed to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around a cone, walk back to the chair, and sit down with their back leaning against the backrest as quickly and safely as possible \[10\]. The time in seconds (s) needed to perform the entire sequence was recorded. Each participant performed the TUG in three attempts with a 2-minute rest between attempts, and the fastest time was used for further analyses.

次要结局

  • Barthel Index(Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups))
  • Body Composition(Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups))
  • Peak Expiratory Flow(Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups))
  • Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS)(Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups))
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(Baseline, Pre- intervention (Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups) and 8 week after interventions (post- Eccentric cycling and Standard rehabilitation groups))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Luis Penailillo

Head of the Exercise and Rehabilitation Science Lab

Universidad Nacional Andres Bello

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验