Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Using Free Stylet 22g and 25 g Needles in Solid Lesions
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Accuracy of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.
研究概览
简要总结
This is a randomized controlled study comparing EUS-FNA with 22 gauge and 25 gauge needles in consecutive patients.
Summary
Background: three needle sizes for endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are currently available: 22 Gauge (G), 25 G and 19 G. However, well design studies comparing them regarding efficacy and feasibility are lacking.
Aims: to investigate diagnostic yield, specimen adequacy, feasibility and complications of the conventional 22 G compared with the 25 G needle.
Methods: patients ≥ 18 years, referred to EUS-FNA for a solid lesion will be considered for inclusion. Patients with suspected diagnosis of lymphoma, GIST, sarcoidosis, significant coagulopathy (APT < 50% or platelets < 50000/mm3), use of warfarin or other anticoagulants, use of clopidogrel within 7 days of EUS, inability or refusal to sign the informed consent and pregnancy or suspected pregnancy will be excluded.
Participants will be randomized to 22 G needle and 25 G FNA. Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions. Continuous variables will be compared using Student´s t test. A two-tailed P values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The diagnostic yield of 25 G and 22 G needle will be evaluated by four criteria: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. An expected rate of 85% diagnostic yield from EUS guided FNA by using 22G needle will be considered. By using a power of 80% and an α value of 0.05 would be necessary 120 patients per group to detect a 15% difference in the rate of diagnostic yield.
详细描述
- Objectives
PRIMARY To compare diagnostic yield of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.
SECONDARY
To investigate:
- specimen adequacy,
- number of FNA passes,
- ease of puncture,
- failure of the FNA needle and
- complications
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of a solid lesion.
排除标准
- •Age < 18 years
- •Patients with suspected diagnosis of lymphoma, GIST, sarcoidosis or other lesions in which a large amount of tissue will be required for diagnosis
- •Significant coagulopathy (INR > 1.5, platelets < 50000/mm3
- •Use of low molecular weight heparin, use of clopidogrel within 7 days of EUS)
- •Cystic lesions
- •Inability or refusal to sign the informed consent
结局指标
主要结局
Accuracy of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.
时间窗: 6 months
次要结局
- Specimen adequacy, number of FNA passes, ease of puncture, failure of the FNA needle and complications(6 months)
