Robot-Assisted Gait and Bicycle Training for Stroke Patients With Pre-Sarcopenia
- Conditions
- StrokeSarcopenia in ElderlyMuscle Weakness
- Registration Number
- NCT06910254
- Lead Sponsor
- Sahmyook University
- Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the effects of overground robot-assisted gait training (o-RAGT) and recumbent bicycle training on muscle mass, physical function, and fall efficacy in subacute stroke patients with pre-sarcopenia. Stroke survivors often experience significant muscle loss and functional decline, especially during the subacute phase. o-RAGT, using a wearable robotic exoskeleton, provides intensive, repetitive gait training on real ground, enhancing sensory feedback and muscle activation. Recumbent bicycle training offers stable lower extremity exercise, promoting muscle strengthening and cardiovascular health. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the combined o-RAGT and recumbent bicycle training group or the recumbent bicycle-only group. Interventions will be provided 5 times a week for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes include changes in muscle mass, muscle quality, and fall efficacy. Secondary outcomes include physical performance (SPPB), functional ambulation (FAC), balance (TUG), and neurological recovery (FMA). This randomized controlled trial aims to establish evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving physical function and reducing fall risk in stroke patients with pre-sarcopenia.
- Detailed Description
Background and Rationale Stroke-induced physical decline includes muscle wasting and reduced functional mobility, particularly in the subacute phase. Pre-sarcopenia-characterized by decreased appendicular skeletal muscle mass without significant loss in strength or performance-can worsen into full sarcopenia without timely intervention. Early physical rehabilitation targeting both muscle mass preservation and gait improvement is critical in this period.
Recent advancements such as overground robot-assisted gait training (o-RAGT) using wearable exoskeletons enable repetitive, real-environment gait practice with adaptive feedback, enhancing motor learning and proprioception. Recumbent bicycle training, in contrast, provides safe, low-impact exercise improving lower limb strength and aerobic capacity. The combination of these modalities may have synergistic effects on muscle mass maintenance and physical performance.
Study Objective This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of combining o-RAGT and recumbent bicycle training on muscle mass, physical function, and fall efficacy in subacute stroke patients with pre-sarcopenia.
Study Design and Intervention Overview
This is a single-center, assessor-blinded RCT including two parallel groups. Participants diagnosed with pre-sarcopenia (per AWGS criteria) within 6 months post-stroke will be randomized into:
Experimental group: 30 minutes of o-RAGT using a robotic exoskeleton (adjusting gait assistance in real time), followed by 30 minutes of recumbent bicycle training per session.
Control group: 30 minutes of recumbent bicycle training alone.
Both groups will train 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions total).
The primary aim is to examine changes in appendicular muscle mass (via BIA) and fall efficacy (Falls Efficacy Scale). Secondary outcomes include SPPB, FAC, TUG, and FMA-Lower Extremity scores.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 53
- Age 19 years or older
- Diagnosis of subacute stroke (within 6 months after stroke onset)
- Diagnosis of pre-sarcopenia based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria
- Able to follow simple instructions and participate in rehabilitation exercises
- Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) level 2 or higher (indicating ability to walk with assistance or supervision)
- Medically stable and cleared for participation in rehabilitation programs by a physician
- Severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 24)
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic diseases that may interfere with exercise participation
- Severe musculoskeletal disorders or joint deformities limiting participation in gait or cycling training
- History of other neurological disorders affecting gait (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
- Participation in other clinical trials involving rehabilitation interventions within the past 3 months
- Contraindications to robot-assisted gait training or recumbent bicycle training
- Significant visual or vestibular impairment affecting balance training
- Any medical condition deemed inappropriate for study participation by the attending physician
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Muscle Quality Baseline and 4 weeks Change in muscle quality will be assessed using appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) relative to body weight, combined with functional performance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). This composite measure reflects both muscle mass and functional capacity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after the 4-week intervention period.
Change in Fall Efficacy Baseline and 4 weeks The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) includes 16 items scored on a 4-point scale, with total scores ranging from 16 to 64.
Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling, representing worse outcomes.
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is reported as approximately 3-4 points.
The Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95) is typically reported as 4.0 points in community-dwelling older adults.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) Baseline and 4 weeks The FAC is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater walking independence.
* MCID: \~1 point (clinically meaningful in stroke populations)
* MDC: Not clearly defined, but ≥1 level considered functionally relevantChange in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score Baseline and 4 weeks The SPPB is scored from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better lower extremity function and physical performance.
A change of ≥1.0 point is considered the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), representing a meaningful improvement in physical function.
The Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) is reported to range from approximately 0.4 to 1.0 point depending on the population and setting.Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time Baseline and 4 weeks The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test measures dynamic balance and functional mobility. It assesses the time (in seconds) it takes for a participant to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, return, and sit down. Lower scores indicate better performance.
* MCID: Typically 3.4 seconds in older adults; may vary by population
* MDC: Ranges from 2.9 to 4.0 seconds depending on clinical group (e.g., stroke, elderly, Parkinson's disease)Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) Lower Extremity Score Baseline and 4 weeks The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the lower extremity (FMA-LE) is used to evaluate motor recovery following stroke. The lower extremity subscale consists of 17 items scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully), with a total score ranging from 0 to 34.
* MCID: Approximately 6.0 points for the lower extremity motor domain in stroke patients
* MDC: Reported between 3.0 to 5.8 points depending on population and study design
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sahmyook University
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of