跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07213986
NCT07213986招募中不适用

Pilot Trial of the Vibrant Capsule for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 12 人开始时间: 2026年1月6日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
12
试验地点
2
主要终点
Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of Vibrant capsules in spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic bowel.

详细描述

The purpose of this study is to see how well the Vibrant capsule works at treating people with spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced upper motor neuron (UMN) neurogenic bowel. This study will test the safety of the Vibrant capsule. This Vibrant capsule has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic idiopathic constipation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) of more than one year.
  • Stable neurological level and function of SCI for at least six months.
  • Consistent bowel program without changes for at least 3 months.
  • At least one scheduled bowel movement (BM) every three days.
  • Use of digital stimulation, suppositories, enemas, or mini enemas, as part of the scheduled bowel program.
  • Use of oral medications as part of the bowel program.

排除标准

  • Bowel incontinence occurring more than once per week.
  • Non-English-speaking individuals.
  • History of bowel obstruction, ileus, diverticulitis, or bowel surgery for a disease (appendix removal is ok).
  • Persistent autonomic dysreflexia (AD) triggered by bowel movements.
  • Recent changes to spasticity medications within the past month.
  • History of significant gastrointestinal disorders
  • History of Zenker's diverticulum
  • Dysphagia
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis or achalasia
  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of implanted devices that could be affected by proximity to a direct current magnetic field.

研究组 & 干预措施

Vibrant Capsule

Experimental

干预措施: Vibrant Capsule (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment, week 5 with treatment, week 6 with treatment, week 7 with treatment, week 8 with treatment

Safety of Vibrant capsule as assessed by the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment, week 5 with treatment, week 6 with treatment, week 7 with treatment, week 8 with treatment

The total score on the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) ranges from 0 to 7, and a higher score indicates greater spasm frequency and severity.

Safety as assessed by average weekly Numerical Pain Score

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment, week 5 with treatment, week 6 with treatment, week 7 with treatment, week 8 with treatment

The Numerical Pain Score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater pain.

Safety as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 4 with treatment, week 8 with treatment

The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) ranges from 0 to 96, with a higher score indicating greater Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms.

Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment

Safety of Vibrant capsule as assessed by the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment

The total score on the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) ranges from 0 to 7, and a higher score indicates greater spasm frequency and severity.

Safety as assessed by average weekly Numerical Pain Score

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment

The Numerical Pain Score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater pain.

Safety as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)

时间窗: week 1 with treatment, week 4 with treatment

The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) ranges from 0 to 96, with a higher score indicating greater Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms.

Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event

时间窗: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4

Safety of Vibrant capsule as assessed by the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)

时间窗: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4

The total score on the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) ranges from 0 to 7, and a higher score indicates greater spasm frequency and severity.

Safety as assessed by average weekly Numerical Pain Score

时间窗: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4

The Numerical Pain Score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater pain.

Safety as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)

时间窗: baseline, week 3

The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) ranges from 0 to 96, with a higher score indicating greater Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms.

次要结局

  • Feasibility of using the Vibrant capsule as indicated by a satisfaction survey(end of study (4 weeks after start of treatment))
  • Feasibility as indicated by the number of participants that adhere to the prescribed use of Vibrant(from week 1 with treatment to week 8 with treatment)
  • Feasibility of using the Vibrant capsule as indicated by a satisfaction survey(end of study (8 weeks after start of treatment))
  • Feasibility as indicated by the number of participants that adhere to the prescribed use of Vibrant(from week 1 with treatment to week 4 with treatment)
  • Feasibility of using the Vibrant capsule as indicated by a satisfaction survey(end of study (4 weeks after start of treatment))

研究者

发起方
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Argyrios Stampas, MD

Professor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验