NCT04152720UnknownNot Applicable
A Randomized, Multi-center, Open, Active-controlled Prospective Design Pilot Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prevention of Infection Foley Catheter as Compared to Conventional Foley Catheter in Patient Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy for Urological Disease
Seoul National University Hospital2 sites in 1 country160 target enrollmentStarted: August 3, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Enrollment
- 160
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- 1) Incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) * 2 weeks after urethral catheterization
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of infection prevention silicone urinary catheters and conventional catheters for patients scheduled to perform urinary catheterization after radical cystectomy for urological diseases for more than 2 weeks Want to prove the clinical efficacy and safety.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 19 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Between 19 and 80 years old
- •Persons requiring urethral catheterization for more than 2 weeks after surgery * due to urological diseases
- •* Radical cystectomy
- •Subjects who voluntarily decided to participate and signed the written informed consent
- •A person who can understand and follow the instructions and participate in the pre-clinical period.
Exclusion Criteria
- •A person with a congenital abnormality in the urinary or reproductive system
- •Immunodeficiency disease (eg HIV infected)
- •Urinary tract fistula
- •Allergic history of the material used in the catheter
- •Symptomatic UTI by baseline time point
- •Dermatitis at the catheter insertion site
- •Pregnant or lactating women
- •A person who does not agree to contraceptive * in a medically accepted manner until the end of the study and 4 weeks after the end of the study.
- •Medically acceptable contraceptive methods: condoms, oral contraceptives lasting at least 12 weeks, injectable or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptives, etc.
- •Inappropriate participation in the study, as determined by the investigator or investigator, as it may affect ethical or clinical trial results.
- •Patients on anti-thrombotic medication (excluding low-dose aspirin (100 mg, up to 300 mg / day))
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
1) Incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) * 2 weeks after urethral catheterization
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes
- 4) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection 2 weeks after urethral catheter insertion in test and control groups(2 weeks)
- 2) Incidence of Significant Bacterial Cultures in Urethral Catheter Tip Culture(2 weeks)
- 5) Antibiotic administration period due to catheter-related urinary tract infection(2 weeks)
- 3) Catheter related complication rate(2 weeks)
- 1) Period until catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) occurs(2 weeks)
Investigators
Ja Hyeon Ku
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Treatment of Urethral Stricture With Urethral Drug BallUrethral Stricture Less Than 2 cmNCT05812482Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.150
Completed
Not Applicable
Test of Discomfort and Malaise of Two Different Urine Catheters in Healthy VolunteersSpinal Cord InjuryNCT01142115Coloplast A/S41
Completed
Not Applicable
Can Investigators Reduce Urinary Catheter Use and Lower Urinary Tract Infection Among Women Undergoing Benign Gynecologic Surgery?Urinary Tract InfectionsUrinary RetentionSatisfactionNCT03127280The Christ Hospital200
Withdrawn
Phase 2
Comparison of an Antibiotic Impregnated PICC Catheter Versus a Regular PICC Catheter in a Tertiary Care SettingPeripherally Inserted Central CathetersNCT01765738Medical University of South Carolina
Unknown
Not Applicable
Intermittent Catheterization Versus Trial Without CatheterBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT05094947Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry200
