Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00982709
NCT00982709CompletedNot Applicable

The Effects of Treadmill Versus Agility Training in Parkinson's Disease

Oregon Health and Science University1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Dynamic Posturography

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Aim:

To determine the Responsiveness of the iMOBILITY in response to intensive physical therapy exercise programs. (Is it sensitive to change?) Although exercise is thought to be the most effective intervention for balance and gait in PD (compared to dopaminergic medication or DBS surgery), the best exercise program for mobility in PD is unknown. The iMOBILITY will be used to quantify balance and gait performance before and after two PT-supervised, intensive, exercise programs, expected to improve balance and gait. The first program is a published Treadmill training program and the second is the investigators new Agility training program with sensorimotor progressions, targeted at specific impairments that underlie the abnormalities of balance and gait in PD (developed for the Kinetics Foundation). This pilot clinical trial will randomize 40 PD subjects into the two exercise programs at OHSU in preparation for a larger clinical trial to determine the most effective exercise for mobility disability in PD. The effects of exercise will be compared with no treatment during a 5-week delay prior to start of exercise.

This trial will also determine the relative responsiveness (compared to traditional clinical scales) of the iMOBILITY for testing the hypothesis that intensive exercise can improve mobility in PD. We will use existing instruments (Berg Balance Scale, BEST of dynamic balance, UPDRS, PDQ-39, 5 times sit-to-stand time and the Functional Performance Battery) to show there is a difference between the exercise groups. Superior responsiveness of the iMOBILITY system will be determined by larger differences with exercise intervention with the iMOBILITY system than with traditional clinical measures of mobility in PD.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Diagnosis of Idiopathic PD

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Other neurological conditions, artificial joints

Arms & Interventions

Exercise Types

Active Comparator

comparing two different exercise programs for PD

Intervention: Aerobic vs. Agility Training (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Dynamic Posturography

Time Frame: pre and post intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • UPDRS(pre and post intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Fay B. Horak

Professor of Neurology

Oregon Health and Science University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials