Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05668715
NCT05668715Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Antimuscarinic Naive and Refractory Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Pamukkale University1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
İmprovement in incontinence episodes

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In this study is the first prospective trial that compares the efficacy of TTNS in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women with idiopathic OAB. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of TTNS on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to OAB in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women. The results of this study would make it easier to understand the place of TTNS among the treatment options in women with idiopathic OAB.

Detailed Description

This study was planned as a prospective clinical trial. The trial was carried out in the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, in between January 2023 and June 2023. The local ethics committee approved the study. All women were informed about the purpose and contents of the study and all women signed written consent to participate in the study.

As previously published by Sonmez et al , BT+IVES succeeded to reduce mean incontinence episodes from 4.40±3.43 to 0.70±0.57 after treatment in the active comparator group while mean incontinence episodes was reduced from 4.15±1.67 to 2.68±1.66 after treatment in the control group (BT). Considering a 50% or greater improvement in incontinence episodes in the referred study, the optimum sample size should be 18 cases in each arm with a level of significance of 95% (α=5%), a power of 95% (ß=0.05) . Taking into account possible withdrawals which was assumed to be about 10% of the number of patients, a total of 40 women (20 women for each group) were calculated for this study. Sample size calculation was performed by the physician using G*Power 3.1 Statistical Power Analysis for Microsoft Windows and Mac. Statistics.

To investigators recruited women with complaints of OAB who were referred to the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit and other related outpatient clinics. Women over the age of 18 with the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic OAB, and who could able to give written informed consent and understand the procedures were included in this study. The criteria for exclusion were as follows. Women who had stress urinary incontinence; a history of PTNS and/or TTNS for OAB within 6 months; urogynecological surgery within 3 months; current vulvovaginitis or urinary tract infections or malignancy; pregnancy; cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator; anatomic or posttraumatic malformations/skin disorders of tibial nerve region on inner ankle that can not allow to apply the electrodes; the strength of PFM less than 3/5 (graded as modified Oxford scale, min:0-max:5); the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) (stage 2 or more); neurogenic bladder; the peripheral or central neurologic pathology; ultrasonographic evidence of post-void residual urine volume more than 100 ml were excluded.

Women with idiopathic OAB were recruited for eligibility and of them who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included for this study. Antimuscarinic naive women were included in Group 1 (n:20), and women resistant to anti-muscarinic agents were included in Group 2 (n:20). Both groups received BT plus TTNS.

Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N) None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Women 18 years and older with clinically idiopathic OAB
  • •Having the ability to give written informed consent
  • •Ability to understand procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Presence of active vaginal or urinary tract infection or malignancy
  • •Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study
  • •History of neurogenic bladder, peripheral or central neurological pathology
  • •Presence of Grade 2 and higher pelvic organ prolapse (POP) according to the International Continence Society (ICS)
  • •Having undergone urogynecological surgery in the last 3 months
  • •Women with stress urinary incontinence
  • •History of PTNS and/or TTNS for OAB in the past 6 months
  • •Presence of a pacemaker or implanted defibrillator
  • •Presence of anatomical or post-traumatic malformations / skin disorders of the tibial nerve region of the inner ankle that do not allow the application of electrodes
  • •PTK strength less than 3/5 (rated as modified Oxford scale, min: 0-max: 5)
  • •Ultrasonographic evidence of a postvoid residual urine volume greater than 100 ml

Arms & Interventions

Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N)

Experimental

None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group.

Intervention: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) (Other)

Group 2: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R)

Active Comparator

Women with idiopathic OAB refractory to anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) when 2 or more were administered for at least 6 weeks each and failure was due to lack of efficacy with or without side effects were included in this group.

Intervention: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

İmprovement in incontinence episodes

Time Frame: 6 months

To determine positive response rate, reduction in incontinence episodes was collected from the 3-day bladder diary. Women with ≥a 50% reduction in incontinence episodes were considered positive responders

Secondary Outcomes

  • The frequencies of voiding(6 months)
  • Cure-improvement rate(6 months)
  • Change in their urinary incontinence(6 months)
  • Nocturia(6 months)
  • Treatment satisfaction(6 months)
  • The number of pads(6 months)
  • Severity of incontinence(6 months)
  • The Quality of Life(6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Necmettin Yildiz

Professor Doctor

Pamukkale University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials