To study and compare pericapsular nerve block versus anterior qudratus lumborum block for ease of position during spinal and post operative analgesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic hip surgeries under spinal anaesthesia-a prospective randomized controlled study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1) To analyse & compare pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and 15 degrees passive leg elevation at 0, 10 minutes and 20, 30 minutes after giving US guided PENG block & QL Block.
研究概览
简要总结
Peripheral nerve group block provide good pain relief after surgery .Pericapsular nerve group block mainly target smaller branches of femoral nerve and nerve around the hip joint those sense pain around hip .This makes pericapsular nerve group block great for pain relief in surgeries aound hip. Anterior quadratus lumborum block is also effective in providing pain relief during positioning for spinal anesthesia as well as also provide pain relief post surgery.so we will study and compare their role in ease of positioning for giving spinal anesthesia and quality of analgesia as well as duration of post operative analgesia .
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA I, II ,III BMI -18.5- 24.9kg/m2 Orthopaedic surgery around hip.
排除标准
- •Fracture old than 2 weeks Unwilling patients Pregnancy Patient having no pain while sitting Any bleeding disorder and patient on anticoagulant.
- •Neurological and musculoskeletal disease.
- •History of allergy to local anaesthetic agent.
结局指标
主要结局
1) To analyse & compare pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and 15 degrees passive leg elevation at 0, 10 minutes and 20, 30 minutes after giving US guided PENG block & QL Block.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
2) To evaluate & compare ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anaesthesia using 4-point EOSP score in both the groups.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
3) To evaluate & compare time to first rescue analgesia in both groups.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
4) To evaluate & compare total pain free period in both the groups.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
5) To evaluate & compare the consumption of total doses of inj diclofenac as post operative analgesic requirement in both the group.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
6) Patient satisfaction score.
时间窗: 0min 10min 20min 30 min
次要结局
- To monitor and compare hemodynamic parameter at rest and 15 degree passive leg elevation(0min 10 min 20 min 30 min)
研究者
Dr Manisha Kumari
Dr. RPGMC TANDA