跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04737382
NCT04737382招募中不适用

Osimertinib Resistance Analysis in Patients With EGFR Mutation Positive Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma That Have Progressed on Osimertinib Treatment'

The Netherlands Cancer Institute7 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2019年8月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
200
试验地点
7
主要终点
EGFR TKI resistance analysis on tumor biopsies and ctDNA

研究概览

简要总结

Initially, patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC respond well to osimertinib, a third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), but eventually progress. Upon progression multiple resistance mechanisms have been described and new therapeutic strategies are being developed to target these resistance mechanisms. Thorough and complete osimertinib resistance analysis enables optimal treatment decision making and might identify new targets for molecular treatment, thereby potentially improving patient outcome.

详细描述

Initially, patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC respond well to osimertinib, a third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), but eventually progress. Upon progression, three main resistance mechanisms can be found (1, 2): 1) alteration of the drug target by secondary or tertiary EGFR mutations (e.g. C797S mutation in the EGFR kinase domain), 2) alteration of downstream signal transduction proteins (e.g. KRAS mutation / amplification) and 3) bypass track resistance like MET or HER2 amplification. A fourth, less frequent, mechanism involves morphological alterations: dedifferentiation by epidermal-mesenchymal transition (EMT) or change to small-cell-lung carcinoma (SCLC), including RB1 loss.

New therapeutic strategies are being developed to target these resistance mechanisms and reports have been published about successful treatment of HER2 and MET amplification. Drugs targeting the C797S mutation are entering the clinic.

Next Generation Sequence (NGS) technology rapidly evolves and it is now feasible to analyse broad panels of genetic alterations in tumor tissue as well as in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

ctDNA based T790M detection is a valid method to test for resistance to first or second generation EGFR TKI's and the ctDNA based technique is increasingly being used for patients with progression on the third generation EGFR TKI osimertinib. Actually, the distribution of osimertinib resistance mechanisms, as known to date, largely comes from ctDNA based datasets, because biopsy based analyses are scarce. Due to impaired sensitivity of ctDNA based analyses when compared to tissue based analysis, especially for copy number variations, these reports might be misleading and lead to suboptimal treatment. Early reports of tumor samples obtained after progression on first / second generation EGFR TKI's have shown that ctDNA and tumor based drug resistance analyses can be concordant or disconcordant and that the tests should be regarded as complimentary [Oxnard et al].

Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA and biopsy based drug resistance analysis after osimertinib treatment and how these tests behave within individual patients are unknown.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Histologically confirmed metastatic NSCLC, characterized by a sensitizing EGFR mutation.
  • Progressive disease, as assessed by the treating physician during osimertinib monotherapy.
  • Eligible for subsequent treatment.
  • Willing to undergo a histological biopsy and withdrawal of a blood sample for ctDNA analysis.
  • Technically possible to take a histological biopsy.

排除标准

  • Osimertinib discontinuation before blood draw and / or histological tumor biopsy.
  • Initiation of a new line of anticancer therapy before blood draw and / or histological tumor biopsy.

结局指标

主要结局

EGFR TKI resistance analysis on tumor biopsies and ctDNA

时间窗: Trough study completion, an average of 2 years

Complete osimertinib resistance analysis in tissue and plasma for all patients in the Netherlands that progress on osimertinib treatment

Recommendation for subsequent treatment

时间窗: Trough study completion, an average of 2 years

Evaluation of these results in an MTB meeting and recommendations for subsequent treatment.

次要结局

  • Evaluate recommended and actually treatment(Trough study completion, an average of 2 years)
  • Evaluate plasma and tumor tissue(Trough study completion, an average of 2 years)
  • Evaluate success rate(Trough study completion, an average of 2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (7)

Loading locations...

相似试验