跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06461780
NCT06461780招募中不适用

Exploring Physical and Psychological Distress, Financial Toxicity, Care Needs and Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy in One Year Follow-up

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2024年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patient-Report Outcome-- Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

研究概览

简要总结

During the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICIT), most of the patients stay at home, but there is lacking of the studies to explore their physical and psychological distress, financial toxicity, care needs, and quality of life. Therefore, the aims of this program are to (1) explore the immune-related adverse event (irAE) severity, distress, financial toxicity, and quality of life and examine the psychometric testing of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM); (2) establish the LINE group for assessing irAE severity and change trajectory of quality of life in one-year follow-up and (3) combined retrospective chart review and the finding in aim (2) to develop the risk prediction model in order to identify the high risk population.

详细描述

To achieve aim 1, a cross-sectional design is conducted to explore irAE severity, distress, financial distress, and quality of life in mixed type of cancer patients receiving ICIT. A structural questionnaire will be used including Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) 33 items, Distress Thermometer (DT), the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST), FACT-ICM, and EORTC-QLQ C30. Correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis will be used to examine the psychometric testing of FACT-ICM.

To achieve aim 2 and 3, a prospective cohort study will be conducted to recruit 200 patients in first course receiving ICIT and follow for 1 year using LINE to report symptoms in weekly reporting within 3 months and once in 3-4 weeks in 4th -12th months during treatment. Data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3th, 6th 9th 12th months) using a set of questionnaires including CTCAE 33 items, DT, COST, Supportive Care Needs Scale-short form34, and FACT-ICM.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • (1) Patients diagnose cancer and are informed
  • (2) Aged ≥18 years old
  • (3) Conscious clear and able to communicate

排除标准

  • (1) Patients who are under other clinical trial

结局指标

主要结局

Patient-Report Outcome-- Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

时间窗: The data will be collected once a week within 3 months and once in 3-4 weeks in 4th-12th months during treatment.

Interviewers graded the severity of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5, from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In this study, we included 33 important symptoms from PRO-CTCAE in immunotherapy patients.

Symptom Severity Scale (SSS)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

The Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) was used to evaluate the symptom severity of cancer patients. It included 25 common symptoms in cancer patients.The severity was scored by an 11-point numerical rating scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severe).

Distress Thermometer (DT)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

The Distress Theremometer is utilized to assess patients' emotional distress and its sources. The assessment was developed by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and to evaluate the psychological distress level of cancer patients. It a single-item-11-point scale, from 0 to 10 points, which ask patients about their overall distress level over the past week, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress.

The COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

The COST-FACIT developed by Souza, is used to assess patients' financial distress. It evaluates the financial situation of patients undergoing treatment for chronic diseases. The scale consists of 12 items rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, where 0 indicates "not at all important" and 4 indicates "very important." Lower scores indicate greater financial toxicity.

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

The FACT-ICM is used to assess the quality of life in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. It comprises 25 symptom-related items specific to immune checkpoint modulation therapy and 27 items from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), totaling 52 items. Ratings are done on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, where 0 indicates no distress at all and 4 indicates extreme distress.

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

To assess the convergent validity of the FACT-ICM, we employed this scale to analyze the correlation between two sets of quality of life data. It consists of 30 items assessing five major functional domains in cancer patients. Ratings for most items are done on a 1 to 4 Likert-type scale, where 1 indicates no presence and 4 indicates very severe presence of symptoms, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life.

Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form 34 (SCNS-SF34)

时间窗: The data will be collected at five times (Before treatment for baseline, the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month)

The SCNS-SF34 comprises 34 items and utilizes a 1 to 5 Likert-type scoring system, where 1 indicates no need and 5 indicates the greatest need for assistance. Scores for each domain, based on the total scores of individual items, are standardized to a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater unmet needs in that domain.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验