Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2021/02/031454
CTRI/2021/02/031454Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

A randomised controlled trial of early versus routine removal of self retaining urinary catheter after uncomplicated total laproscopic hysterectomy

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES PATNA1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: February 25, 2021Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Voiding difficulty after ECR (time frame : 6 hours after removal of catheter) in uncomplicated TLH patients

Study Overview

Brief Summary

DuringTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), standard care is to place an indwelling catheter,usually self-retaining, during surgery to avoid iatrogenic injuries of the bladder, monitor urinary output and check for hematuria.

Timeof removal of this catheter in uncomplicated cases is usually after 24 hours.There is limited guidelines for catheter removal post-TLH.

Accordingto Cochrane review (2008), catheter placement should only be as long asrequired, as prolonged catheterization is associated with urinary tractinfections, delayed mobilization of patients and longer time to dischargeincreasing unnecessary hospital stay. Patients too have discomfort while oncatheter.

IfECR outcomes are found to be similar or better than RCR, patients maybedischarged earlier reducing hospital stay and well-being.

ProblemStatement/ Rationale: early removal of the cathetermay overcome all these issues but also have been associated with higher urinaryretention rates and re-catheterization. However, many centers have now starteddaycare hysterectomy requiring immediate or early removal of catheter butevidence for this is limited.

 Novelty: Withthis in mind, we intend to evaluate if early catheter removal (ECR- <4 hours)after TLH was associated with similar or better outcomes compared with routinecatheter removal (RCR- >24hrs) through this study,it proves its Originality.

 Research Question: To see voiding difficulty after early vs delayedremoval of urinary catheters.

Research Hypothesis: The study is based on the assumption that ECR has similar/better outcomes than RCR

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Computer generated randomization
Masking
Open Label

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
30.00 Year(s) to 70.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
Female

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients posted for TLH for the benign indication (e.g. AUB, Fibroids) and low-grade malignancy.
  • Patients willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients not willing to participate in the study 2) Pregnant women 3) TLH patients having concomitant procedures such as prolapse surgery 3) TLH patients with extensive adhesions like endometriosis surgery or advanced oncological dissection including nodal dissection 4) Those with stress and urge incontinence 5) Patients with pre-op UTI 6) Inability to void (paraplegia, MS).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Voiding difficulty after ECR (time frame : 6 hours after removal of catheter) in uncomplicated TLH patients

Time Frame: 6 hours after removal of catheter

Secondary Outcomes

  • a.PVR ( post void residual urine)(b.Rate of recatheterisation)

Investigators

Sponsor
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES PATNA
Sponsor Class
Government medical college

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials