跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05817279
NCT05817279招募中不适用

AI-aided Optical Coherence Tomography for the Detection of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Maastricht University Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 124 人开始时间: 2023年4月10日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
124
试验地点
1
主要终点
Proportion of high-confidence diagnoses

研究概览

简要总结

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of cancer among the Caucasian population. A BCC diagnosis is commonly establish by means of an invasive punch biopsy (golden standard). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a safe non-invasive diagnostic modality which may replace biopsy if an OCT assessor is able to establish a high confidence BCC diagnosis. Hence, for clinical implementation of OCT, diagnostic certainty should be as high as possible. Artificial intelligence in the form of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) may improve the diagnostic certainty of newly trained OCT assessors by highlighting suspicious areas on OCT scans and by providing diagnostic suggestions (classification). This study will evaluate the effect of a CDSS on the diagnostic certainty and accuracy of OCT assessors.

详细描述

In this diagnostic case control design, OCT assessors will retrospectively evaluate OCT scans of equivocal BCC lesions twice (once with, and once without the help of the CDSS). A total of 124 scans (62 BCC/62 non-BCC) will be included in the study. Cases will be shuffled to prevent recall bias. AI-aided OCT scans and unaided OCT scans will be presented in alternating order. The assessors will express their certainty level on a 5-point confidence scale. The diagnostic certainty and diagnostic accuracy of OCT assessment with CDSS and without CDSS will be compared.

Research questions:

  1. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in an increase in high-confidence diagnoses compared to unaided OCT assessment?
  2. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in a significant increase in sensitivity for BCC detection without compromising specificity compared to unaided OCT assessment?
  3. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in more accurate BCC subtyping compared to unaided OCT assessment (explorative)

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients (18+ years)
  • Patient underwent OCT scan and punch biopsy for an equivocal BCC lesion

排除标准

  • Patient unable to sign informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of high-confidence diagnoses

时间窗: 31-12-2023

The difference in percentage of high-confidence diagnoses will be evaluated between AI-OCT and unaided OCT.

次要结局

  • Diagnostic accuracy of high-confidence diagnoses(31-12-2023)
  • Diagnostic parameters for BCC subtyping(31-12-2023)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验