Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 154
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.
研究概览
简要总结
Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF.
PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.
详细描述
All participating patients are required to provide written (or equivalent) informed consent, indicated by a dated signature of the subject or legal representative. The consent process must comply with applicable national regulations and use language understandable by the patient.
The study will be conducted at 6 clinical centres/investigational sites across the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into a PFA or point-by-point RF ablation arm. Randomization will occur prior to the ablation procedure. A implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted in all randomised patients one month before ablation to accurately monitor any AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/ atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Treatment allocation will be processed through the Dutch 'National Heart Registry' (NHR) data platform.
Patients randomized to both arms of the study will be evaluated for PV isolation at the start of the ablation procedure. If PV reconnection is identified in patients in the point-by-point RF arm, re-ablation will occur according to the study protocol. Patients in the PFA arm will have PV reconnection determined using the FARAWAVE catheter. Those with no PV reconnection (100% PV isolation/durable PVI) will be followed in an observational registry.
The PFA ablation arm involves the use of the Farastar generator system, Farawave ablation catheter, and Faradrive steering catheter for the procedure. The RF point-by-point ablation arm (control) involves RF ablation following standard practice.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Patients know their treatment arm. All endpoints will be adjudicated by a blinded endpoint committee.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.
时间窗: 12 months
12-month incidence of AF/AFl/AT recurrence.
次要结局
- To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.(24 months)
- Repeat PVI within 12 and 24 months of randomization(12 and 24 months)
- AF burden with and without 3 months blanking period(12 and 24 months)
- Change in quality of life(12 and 24 months)
- Change in quality of life as affected by AF(12 and 24 months)
- AF hospitalisation / urgent visit(12 and 24 months)
- Cost-effectiveness(12 and 24 months)
- Rate of ischemic stroke(12 and 24 months (efficacy))
- Complications of ablation(0-30 days post ablation)