Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion (FSP) Versus Intra-uterine Insemination (IUI) in Natural Cycle
- Conditions
- Insemination, Artificial
- Interventions
- Procedure: Intrauterine insemination using standard catheterProcedure: Fallopian tube sperm perfusion
- Registration Number
- NCT00816387
- Lead Sponsor
- IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) in comparison with standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in natural cycle for couples with unexplained infertility or mild male factor.
- Detailed Description
A number of randomised controlled trials have been published comparing the efficacy of FSP with standard IUI. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that in couples with unexplained infertility Fallopian tube sperm perfusion together with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) leads to increased pregnancy rates than IUI and COH. No study has been published comparing the two insemination techniques in natural cycle.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 400
- infertility for at least 2 years
- age <40 years
- unexplained infertility or mild male factor
- previous assisted reproduction treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description IUI Intrauterine insemination using standard catheter Intrauterine insemination using standard catheter FSP Fallopian tube sperm perfusion Fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a commercial device for hysterosalpingography and tubal hydropertubation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method clinical pregnancy rate 2 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Abortion rate 2 years Ectopic pregnancy rate 2 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
🇮🇹Trieste, Italy