MedPath

Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion (FSP) Versus Intra-uterine Insemination (IUI) in Natural Cycle

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Insemination, Artificial
Interventions
Procedure: Intrauterine insemination using standard catheter
Procedure: Fallopian tube sperm perfusion
Registration Number
NCT00816387
Lead Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) in comparison with standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in natural cycle for couples with unexplained infertility or mild male factor.

Detailed Description

A number of randomised controlled trials have been published comparing the efficacy of FSP with standard IUI. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that in couples with unexplained infertility Fallopian tube sperm perfusion together with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) leads to increased pregnancy rates than IUI and COH. No study has been published comparing the two insemination techniques in natural cycle.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
400
Inclusion Criteria
  • infertility for at least 2 years
  • age <40 years
  • unexplained infertility or mild male factor
Exclusion Criteria
  • previous assisted reproduction treatment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
IUIIntrauterine insemination using standard catheterIntrauterine insemination using standard catheter
FSPFallopian tube sperm perfusionFallopian tube sperm perfusion using a commercial device for hysterosalpingography and tubal hydropertubation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
clinical pregnancy rate2 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Abortion rate2 years
Ectopic pregnancy rate2 years

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

🇮🇹

Trieste, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath