Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00849056
NCT00849056CompletedPhase 3

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide When Used in Combination With Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

GlaxoSmithKline1 site in 1 country310 target enrollmentStarted: January 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
310
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of albiglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • type 2 diabetes
  • BMI 20-45kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

  • NYHA Class II to IV heart failure
  • females who are pregnant, lactating, or less than 6 weeks post-partum

Arms & Interventions

placebo + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

Placebo Comparator

Placebo albiglutide weekly injection + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

Intervention: placebo (Drug)

albiglutide + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

Experimental

albiglutide weekly injection + pioglitazone (with or without meformin)

Intervention: albiglutide (Biological)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. One Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participant (par.) had all post-BL HbA1c measurements occur after hyperglycemic rescue. This par. is included in the ITT Population counts but did not contribute to this analysis.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52(Baseline and Week 52)
  • Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue(From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156))
  • Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52(Baseline and Week 52)
  • Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156(Week 156)
  • Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156(Baseline and Week 156)
  • Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156(Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156)
  • Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156(Baseline and Week 156)
  • Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52(Week 52)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials