MedPath

Comparison of Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Modified MPI for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients

Not Applicable
Conditions
Alveolar Bone Loss
Interventions
Procedure: The coronally advanced lingual flap
Procedure: Modified periosteal releasing Incision
Registration Number
NCT03466840
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

Comparison of cronally advanced lingual flap to modified periosteal releasing incision (MPRI)

Detailed Description

Clinical Assessment and Comparison of Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients Undergoing Guided Bone Regeneration Using Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
7
Inclusion Criteria
  • Partially edentulous patients in the mandibular posterior region.
  • Patients with healthy systemic condition.
  • Insufficient ridge width (< 5mm).
  • Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.
  • Adequate soft tissue biotype (≥ 2 mm).
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with the results of the study.
  • Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.
  • Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.
  • Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as smoking, alcoholism or para-functional habits.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
The Coronally Advanced Lingual FlapThe coronally advanced lingual flapOn the lingual side of mandible, a full-thickness muco-periosteal flap is elevated until reaching mylohyoid line. Using a blunt instrument, a connective tissue band is localized continuing with the epimysium of the mylohyoid muscle and is inserted into the inner part of the lingual flap . The blunt instrument is inserted below the connective band, and with gentle traction in the coronal direction, this muscular insertion was detached from the lingual flap. Using a "periodontal probe" the amount of advancement is measured.
Modified periosteal releasing IncisionModified periosteal releasing IncisionA full-thickness muco-periosteal flap is reflected on the buccal side. Near the base of muco-periosteal flap, the periosteum is incised less than 0.5mm in depth, creating two segments, "coronal segment" and "apical segment," of the periosteal flap. The flap is pulled with a pair of periodontal forceps laterally. Subsequently, the "lateral stretching" of the coronal segment of the flap is performed by applying pressure using the blunt face of scalpel blade, or a blunt instrument, with sweeping motion. This motion helps stretching the flap over the submucosa, thereby permitting the flap to be mobile.Using a "periodontal probe" the amount of advancement is measured
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Flap advancement"10 minutes"

Flap advancement will be measured as a difference between the value before and after in millimeters using periodontal probe.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postoperative Pain1 Week

Postoperative Pain will be recorded using Numerical Rating scale (NRS) The scores will be recorded postoperatively by the patient for the seven days of observation.

Postoperative membrane exposure12 Weeks

Postoperative membrane exposure will be evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 weeks using a periodontal probe in millimeters.

bone density12 Weeks

bone density will before and after with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

postoperative swelling"1 week"

postoperative swelling will be recorded using descriptive four point scale(Penarrocha et al.2006).The scores will be recorded postoperatively by the patient for the seven days of observation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Noha Diab

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath