Comparison of Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Modified MPI for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Loss
- Interventions
- Procedure: The coronally advanced lingual flapProcedure: Modified periosteal releasing Incision
- Registration Number
- NCT03466840
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Comparison of cronally advanced lingual flap to modified periosteal releasing incision (MPRI)
- Detailed Description
Clinical Assessment and Comparison of Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients Undergoing Guided Bone Regeneration Using Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 7
- Partially edentulous patients in the mandibular posterior region.
- Patients with healthy systemic condition.
- Insufficient ridge width (< 5mm).
- Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.
- Adequate soft tissue biotype (≥ 2 mm).
- Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with the results of the study.
- Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.
- Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as smoking, alcoholism or para-functional habits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description The Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap The coronally advanced lingual flap On the lingual side of mandible, a full-thickness muco-periosteal flap is elevated until reaching mylohyoid line. Using a blunt instrument, a connective tissue band is localized continuing with the epimysium of the mylohyoid muscle and is inserted into the inner part of the lingual flap . The blunt instrument is inserted below the connective band, and with gentle traction in the coronal direction, this muscular insertion was detached from the lingual flap. Using a "periodontal probe" the amount of advancement is measured. Modified periosteal releasing Incision Modified periosteal releasing Incision A full-thickness muco-periosteal flap is reflected on the buccal side. Near the base of muco-periosteal flap, the periosteum is incised less than 0.5mm in depth, creating two segments, "coronal segment" and "apical segment," of the periosteal flap. The flap is pulled with a pair of periodontal forceps laterally. Subsequently, the "lateral stretching" of the coronal segment of the flap is performed by applying pressure using the blunt face of scalpel blade, or a blunt instrument, with sweeping motion. This motion helps stretching the flap over the submucosa, thereby permitting the flap to be mobile.Using a "periodontal probe" the amount of advancement is measured
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Flap advancement "10 minutes" Flap advancement will be measured as a difference between the value before and after in millimeters using periodontal probe.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative Pain 1 Week Postoperative Pain will be recorded using Numerical Rating scale (NRS) The scores will be recorded postoperatively by the patient for the seven days of observation.
Postoperative membrane exposure 12 Weeks Postoperative membrane exposure will be evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 weeks using a periodontal probe in millimeters.
bone density 12 Weeks bone density will before and after with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
postoperative swelling "1 week" postoperative swelling will be recorded using descriptive four point scale(Penarrocha et al.2006).The scores will be recorded postoperatively by the patient for the seven days of observation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Noha Diab
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt