Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03613818
NCT03613818
Completed
Not Applicable

Efficacy of a Web-Based Alcohol Intervention for High School Students

Boise State University1 site in 1 country311 target enrollmentSeptember 15, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Underage Drinking
Sponsor
Boise State University
Enrollment
311
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Frequency of Alcohol Use
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO as an intervention to reduce underage drinking and the associated negative consequences among high school seniors. The aim of this project is to provide a brief, low cost intervention that can be easily disseminated as a school-based intervention to address this important public health problem.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 15, 2018
End Date
April 1, 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Diana Doumas

Distinguished Professor

Boise State University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Senior enrolled in high school sites

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Frequency of Alcohol Use

Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Frequency of alcohol use was assessed with the question "How often do you use alcohol?" with responses provided on an 8-point Likert scale with options ranging from "0" to "7" ("Do not drink alcohol" to "Every day"). Items were reverse scores so higher scores represent higher levels of drinking frequency. Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Higher scores are worse outcomes

Weekly Drinking

Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Daily Drinking Questionnaire Weekly drinking was assessed with the question "Given that it is a typical week, please write the number of drinks you probably would have each day." A response scale is provided for each day of the week (e.g., Monday__, Tuesday__, etc.)." Weekly drinking was calculated by combining the reports for the seven days of the week (sum of the 7 days). Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 26 Higher scores are worse outcomes

Peak Drinking Quantity

Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Peak drinking quantity was assessed with the question "What is the most number of drinks that you have consumed on any given night in the past month?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 25 Higher scores are worse outcomes

Heavy Episodic Drinking

Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Heavy Episodic Drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks in a row for males and 3 or more for females in a 2 hour period in the past month. The number of drinks was based on research by Donovan (2009) establishing cut-points for children and adolescents. Participants were asked: "Males: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 5 or more drinks in a two hour period?" "Females: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 3 or more drinks in a two hour period?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .76 Higher scores are worse outcomes

Blood Alcohol Concentration

Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Blood alcohol concentration was calculated using the Widmark Formula (1932/1981); BAC = \[Alcohol consumed in grams / (Body weight in grams x r)\] x 100. In this formula, "r" is the gender constant. Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .62 Higher scores are worse outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

  • Alcohol-Related Consequences(Baseline and 6-month follow up)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials