MedPath

Efficacy of a Web-Based Alcohol Intervention for High School Students

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Underage Drinking
Interventions
Behavioral: eCHECKUP TO GO
Registration Number
NCT03613818
Lead Sponsor
Boise State University
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO as an intervention to reduce underage drinking and the associated negative consequences among high school seniors. The aim of this project is to provide a brief, low cost intervention that can be easily disseminated as a school-based intervention to address this important public health problem.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
311
Inclusion Criteria
  • Senior enrolled in high school sites
Exclusion Criteria
  • none

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
eCHECKUP TO GOeCHECKUP TO GOBrief, web-based alcohol intervention
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Frequency of Alcohol UseBaseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire

Frequency of alcohol use was assessed with the question "How often do you use alcohol?" with responses provided on an 8-point Likert scale with options ranging from "0" to "7" ("Do not drink alcohol" to "Every day"). Items were reverse scores so higher scores represent higher levels of drinking frequency.

Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Weekly DrinkingBaseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Daily Drinking Questionnaire

Weekly drinking was assessed with the question "Given that it is a typical week, please write the number of drinks you probably would have each day." A response scale is provided for each day of the week (e.g., Monday__, Tuesday__, etc.)." Weekly drinking was calculated by combining the reports for the seven days of the week (sum of the 7 days).

Minimum = 0; Maximum = none

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 26

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Peak Drinking QuantityBaseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire

Peak drinking quantity was assessed with the question "What is the most number of drinks that you have consumed on any given night in the past month?"

Minimum = 0; Maximum = none

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 25

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Heavy Episodic DrinkingBaseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Heavy Episodic Drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks in a row for males and 3 or more for females in a 2 hour period in the past month. The number of drinks was based on research by Donovan (2009) establishing cut-points for children and adolescents.

Participants were asked:

"Males: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 5 or more drinks in a two hour period?" "Females: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 3 or more drinks in a two hour period?"

Minimum = 0; Maximum = none

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .76

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Blood Alcohol ConcentrationBaseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up

Blood alcohol concentration was calculated using the Widmark Formula (1932/1981); BAC = \[Alcohol consumed in grams / (Body weight in grams x r)\] x 100. In this formula, "r" is the gender constant.

Minimum = 0; Maximum = none

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .62

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Alcohol-Related ConsequencesBaseline and 6-month follow up

Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory

Alcohol-related consequences were measured using the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory. The Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory is a 23-item scale. Participants were asked "How many times have the following scenarios happened to you while you were consuming alcohol or as a result of your drinking in the past 30 days." Responses were measured on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (more than 10 times). A total consequence score is created by summing the 23 items.

Minimum = 0; Maximum = 92

Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 24

Higher scores are worse outcomes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Boise State University

🇺🇸

Boise, Idaho, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath