Comparison of Analgesic efficacy of Erector Spinae plane block with Paravertebral block in adult patient undergoing subcostal incision abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 46
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the post operative 24 hour opioid consumption
研究概览
简要总结
Upper abdominal surgeries often involve extensive tissue manipulation and surgical incisions, which can result in significant postoperative pain. Adequate analgesia is essential to ensure patient comfort and promote a smoother recovery process. Effective pain management plays a crucial role in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. By providing optimal analgesia, patients experience reduced pain and discomfort, enabling them to mobilize earlier, resume normal activities, and achieve faster recovery. Inadequate pain control can lead to decreased respiratory function, shallow breathing, and impaired lung expansion. This can potentially increase the risk of postoperative complications, such as atelectasis and pneumonia. Optimal analgesia helps maintain respiratory function, reducing the likelihood of such complications. Adequate pain relief promotes patient satisfaction and overall well-being. Patients experiencing well-controlled pain are more likely to have a positive perception of their surgical experience, resulting in higher patient satisfaction scores. Achieving effective pain control requires a multimodal approach that combines different analgesic techniques and medications. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has been successfully used as anaesthesia for liver and kidney tumor ablation surgery. Different analgesia techniques, including local anaesthetic infiltration, intercostal nerve block, paravertebral block, and thoracic epidural anesthesia, have been described to attenuate the intensity of acute postoperative pain. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an effective technique in controlling pain after lower thoracic and upper abdominal surgeries. The erector spinae block has demonstrated efficacy in various surgical procedures, including thoracic surgery, breast surgery, and abdominal surgery.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 75.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients aged 18 yrs to 75 yrs ASA I and II patients for scheduled to undergo elective subcostal incision abdominal surgery.
排除标准
- •Patients aged less than 18 yrs and more than 75 yrs ASA III and IV patients Patients refusing for study Local site infection or lesions.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the post operative 24 hour opioid consumption
时间窗: To compare the post operative 24 hour opioid consumption
次要结局
- To compare the time of first rescue analgesic administration(From the time of administration of block to the first need of use of analgesic administration)
- To compare intra operative opioid consumption(From the time of administration of block to the end of the surgery)
- To measure the average pain NRS score at 24 hour post operative period.(30 minutes, 2 hour, 4 hour, 8 hour, 12 hour, 24 hour)
研究者
PRINCE KUMAR
AIIMS PATNA
