Peri-implantitis Implantoplasty Treatment
- Conditions
- Peri-ImplantitisPeri-implant Mucositis
- Interventions
- Procedure: ImplantoplastyProcedure: Open flap debridement alone
- Registration Number
- NCT04052373
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Oslo
- Brief Summary
This double arm, split-mouth, single centre, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of implantoplasty in treatment of peri-implantitis.
Peri-implantitis will be treated with open flap debridement, with or without implantoplasty.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
- Peri-implantitis (according to 2018 criteria) on minimum 2 implants of similar surface and defect type
- Competent to give consent
- Exposed, modified implant surface with loss >2mm
- Previous radiotherapy to the jaws, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment
- Present or past use of bisphosphonate treatment • Pregnant or nursing subjects
- Patients classified as > class II according to ASA classification
- Implant unavailable for implantoplasty treatment
- Inhability to comprehend and respond to the quality of life questionnaire
- Examiners/operators deem original placement of implant (angle, position) suboptimal and considered to play a major role in development of peri-implantitis
- History of peri-implantitis surgery prior to 6 months of screening
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Peri-implantitis treatment with implantoplasty Open flap debridement alone Open flap debridement with implantoplasty treatment Peri-implantitis treatment with implantoplasty Implantoplasty Open flap debridement with implantoplasty treatment Peri-implantitis treatment without implantoplasty Implantoplasty Open flap debridement withput implantoplasty treatment Peri-implantitis treatment without implantoplasty Open flap debridement alone Open flap debridement withput implantoplasty treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bleeding on probing 24 months after treatment Measured with a periodontal probe
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical attachment loss measurements 24 months after treatment Measured with a periodontal probe
Radiographic bone loss 24 months after treatment Measured on standardized radiograps
Implant fracture 24 months Clinical examination to assess whether implants have fractured following treatment
Suppuration 24 months after treatment Visible suppuration upon probing the implant with a periodontal probe
Pocket probing depth 24 months after treatment Measured with a periodontal probe
Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of "The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP)" instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected; (2) less than once a month; (3) once or twice a month; (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome.
Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected; including category (1)
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo
🇳🇴Oslo, Norway
Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway
🇳🇴Oslo, Norway