Patient's acceptance of unsedated transnasal endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy: a prospective raodomized comparative study
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- upper gastrointestinal disease
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000025848
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical corporation Yamashita Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Cases with severe complications are excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method VAS scale of patient's acceptance after endoscopic examination: conventinal endoscopy using EG-L600WR7 vs transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7, transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7 vs GIF-H290
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The autonomic nervous responses were determined from heart-rate variations: HF power/LF power and Log HF power during examination. Systolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Procedure time during and after examinatioGagging: conventinal endoscopy using EG-L600WR7 vs transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7, transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7 vs GIF-H290