Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07304635
NCT07304635
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combined With Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block Within the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Program: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Ankara University1 site in 1 country42 target enrollmentStarted: August 30, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
42
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
VAS (resting)

Overview

Brief Summary

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial within the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) program compares postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus ESP combined with superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

Detailed Description

Rationale: Effective multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is crucial in cardiac surgery to enhance recovery and reduce pulmonary and cognitive complications. Neuraxial techniques (e.g., epidural) carry increased hematoma risk under anticoagulation; hence, fascial plane blocks like ESP and SPIP are safer alternatives.

Methodology: Randomized (ResearchRandomizer.org), 1:1 allocation, opaque sealed envelopes. ESP and SPIP performed under ultrasound guidance at standardized doses and locations.

Blinding: Patients and postoperative evaluators are blinded; block-performing anesthesiologist unblinded but uninvolved in assessment.

Follow-up: 0-72 hours after extubation with predefined time points for VAS, RASS, and Nu-DESC evaluations.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Masking Description

The study will be double-blind, meaning neither the researchers nor the participants will know which treatment group they belong to, ensuring unbiased outcome assessment.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

VAS (resting)

Time Frame: Up to 72 hours post-extubation

Average of VAS scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after extubation (t=0). Lower scores indicate better analgesia. Pain was assessed using the 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain severity was classified as follows: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-10 = severe pain. Rescue analgesia was administered when VAS score was \> 4.

Secondary Outcomes

  • VAS (movement)(0-72 hours)
  • Total rescue tramadol use (mg)(0-72 hours)
  • Time to first rescue analgesic (min)(0-72 hours)
  • Delirium incidence (Nu-DESC ≥ 2)(12, 24, 48, 72 hours)
  • RASS score profile(0, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

FATMA CANDAN YEREBAKAN

Principal Investigator

Ankara University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials