Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01609348
NCT01609348
Completed
Not Applicable

Venlafaxine for Depression in Alzheimer's Disease

Johns Hopkins University2 sites in 1 country5 target enrollmentApril 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Placebo
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Enrollment
5
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Changes in Dose Response Using the Modified Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will test the use of venlafaxine to treat the depression in Alzheimer's Disease. Venlafaxine works by increasing natural substances in the brain (serotonin and norepinephrine) that help maintain mental balance. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the commonest neurodegenerative disease of aging and the cause of major financial and emotional burden to patients, families and caregivers, and society. Depression is a very common symptom of AD, affecting as many as 50% of patients over their illness. Depression in AD (Alzheimer's disease) contributes greatly to patient disability and caregiver distress. Neither psychosocial interventions nor psychotropic medications have proven effective to date for the treatment of depression in AD.Venlafaxine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of major depression but it is not known whether or not it can help depression in Alzheimer's Disease.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2012
End Date
January 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diploma in Social Medicine (DSM)-IV (TR) criteria (90), with a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (82) score of 10-26 inclusive;
  • Depression as defined by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Consensus Criteria,
  • Clinical Dementia Rating Scale of 1 "mild" or 2 "moderate". Ratings of 3 "severe" will be excluded because many of the instruments lack validity in the presence of severe cognitive impairment, particularly language deficits.
  • Sufficiently good health to be treated using the study protocol in usual care circumstances;
  • Patient or surrogate and caregiver provides informed consent for participation in the study;
  • A caregiver is available who spends at least 10 hours per week with the patient, supervises her care, and is willing to accompany the patient to study visits and to provide information about the patient.
  • Female participants must be at least 2 years post menopause or surgically sterilized. Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of a brain disease that might otherwise fully explain the presence of dementia, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, and similar neurologic diseases;
  • Clinically significant psychosis that requires antipsychotic treatment; -Treatment with venlafaxine is contraindicated in the opinion of the attending psychiatrist, for example if there is a prior history of dangerous or -unacceptable side effects when treated with venlafaxine;
  • Failure of treatment with venlafaxine in the past for depression after convincing evidence of a "good trial," for example 8 weeks at the highest tolerated dose;

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Sugar pill

Intervention: Placebo

Venlafaxine

225 mg daily over 12 weeks

Intervention: Venlafaxine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in Dose Response Using the Modified Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change.

Time Frame: 12 weeks

Treatment will be considered efficacious if the proportion of worse categories (including 'minimal worsening', 'moderate worsening', or 'marked worsening') is lower under treatment than control on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change. Clinical Global Impression of Change: This is a 7-item score ranging from "markedly worse" to "markedly improved". It is assessed by the study clinician who interviews both participant and informant and makes an informed judgment how to incorporate their input

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials