ACTRN12608000019303
Recruiting
Phase 3
A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
M.D Anderson Cancer Centre0 sites740 target enrollmentJanuary 14, 2008
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Sponsor
- M.D Anderson Cancer Centre
- Enrollment
- 740
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix;
- •2\. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 (with lymph vascular space invasion), IA2, or IB1 disease;
- •3\. Patients undergoing either a Type II or III radical hysterectomy (Piver Classification)
- •4\. Patients with adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function:
- •4\.1 White Blood Cells (WBC) \> 3,000 cells/mcl
- •4\.2 Platelets \>100,000/mcl
- •4\.3 Creatinine \<2\.0 mg/dL (Non\-Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (non – IDMS))
- •4\.4 Bilirubin \<1\.5 x normal and Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) or Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) \<3 x normal
- •5\. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0\-1;
- •6\. Patient must be suitable candidates for surgery;
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Any histological type other than adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix;
- •2\. Tumor size greater than 4 cm;
- •3\. FIGO stage II\-IV;
- •4\. Patients with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy;
- •5\. Patients who are pregnant;
- •6\. Patients with contraindications to surgery;
- •7\. Patients with evidence of metastatic disease by conventional imaging studies, enlarged pelvic or aortic lymph nodes \> 2cm; or histologically positive lymph nodes 8\. Unfit for Surgery: serious concomitant systemic disorders incompatible with the study (at the discretion of the investigator);
- •9\. Patients unable to withstand prolonged lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position
- •10\. Patient compliance and geographic proximity that do not allow adequate follow\-up.
- •11\. Patients who agree to intra\-operative lymphatic mapping (IOLM) must not have: \- Known allergies to triphenylmethane compounds. \- History of retroperitoneal surgery. \- History of pelvic irradiation. \- Cold knife or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) cone biopsy within 4 wks of enrollment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic or Robotic RH using cancer cell spillage minimizing techniques vs Abdominal RH In Patients with Early-Stage Cervical CancerKCT0008661Asan Medical Center452
Recruiting
Phase 3
JCOG2202: Randomized phase III trial of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancerResectable pancreatic cancerJPRN-jRCT1031220705akamura Masafumi370
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Primary Crural Repair versus Primary Repair with Circular Bio-absorbable Hiatal Mesh Reinforcement in Hiatal Hernia RepairNL-OMON48062Isala Klinieken220
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Primary Crural Repair versus Primary Repair with Circular Bio-absorbable Hiatal Mesh Reinforcement in Hiatal Hernia RepairNL-OMON27270Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.220
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Primary Diaphragm Repair with Sutures Alone versus Sutures Reinforced with Mesh for Hiatus Hernia: A Long-Term Follow-UpNL-OMON53688Rijnstate Ziekenhuis70